Key result
Real-world spironolactone initiation lags, reaching just ~21% in HFrEF and even less in HFpEF.
Why the study?
Real-world utilization of spironolactone in HFrEF and HFpEF was unknown.
What is the real-world utilization of spironolactone among patients with HFrEF and HFpEF?
Cohort (n=11,267,043)
Yes
What is the real-world utilization of spironolactone among patients with HFrEF and HFpEF?
Absolute Event Rate: 20.7% vs 7.6%
Real-world utilization of spironolactone is low among US patients with heart failure, particularly in those with HFpEF (7.6%) compared to HFrEF (20.7%).
Low spironolactone initiation in HFrEF and HFpEF; leaves open whether this reflects underuse or appropriate caution given weak evidence in HFpEF.
Background: Spironolactone is a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist indicated for the management of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). In a previous clinical trial, spironolactone significantly lowered the incidence of heart failure (HF) hospitalizations among HF patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Real world utilization of spironolactone in HFrEF and HFpEF is unknown. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using data from FDA’s Sentinel System. We identified patients with HFrEF or HFpEF using diagnosis and procedure codes from a previously validated algorithm. We required patients to be continuously enrolled in the 183 days prior to HF diagnosis. Follow-up started on the day of HF diagnosis and ended at the earliest occurrence of a spironolactone dispensing, disenrollment, death, or end of data. We calculated the proportion of spironolactone utilization, and for those initiating treatment, we estimated the dose and duration of the first continuous treatment episode. Results: Among 2,009,529 HFrEF patients, 57.8% were male, and mean age was 73.8 ± 12.1 years. Among 9,257,514 HFpEF patients, 42.7% were male, and mean age was 73.0 ± 12.1 years. The proportion of spironolactone utilization following HFrEF diagnosis was 20.7% versus 7.6% after HFpEF. The median time (days) to initiation of spironolactone after HFrEF diagnosis was 90 (IQR: 19–385) versus 286 (IQR: 57–851) after HFpEF diagnosis. The median duration (days) of first treatment episode in HFrEF patients was 120 (IQR: 44–321) and 114 (IQR: 32–301) for HFpEF patients. The median dose was similar (25 mg/day) for both HF cohorts. Conclusion: Findings of low real-world utilization of spironolactone from our large, geographically, and demographically diverse multi-site study in the US are consistent with reports from smaller studies in the literature. Similar spironolactone dosing and duration were observed in both the HFpEF and HFrEF cohorts. Future research characterizing spironolactone treated and untreated HFpEF cohorts will be needed to identify treatment gaps.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eworuke et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFrEF and HFpEF) (n=11,267,043). Spironolactone vs. HFpEF cohort was evaluated on Proportion of spironolactone utilization. Spironolactone utilization was low in real-world practice, with 20.7% of HFrEF patients and 7.6% of HFpEF patients initiating therapy following diagnosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: