Key result
MR-proANP and NT-proBNP provided similar diagnostic accuracy for acute heart failure, but only MR-proANP was independently associated with mortality in AECOPD patients.
Why the study?
Does MR-proANP provide similar diagnostic and prognostic value compared to NT-proBNP in patients with acute dyspnea?
Observational (n=313)
Does MR-proANP provide similar diagnostic and prognostic value compared to NT-proBNP in patients with acute dyspnea?
MR-proANP provides similar diagnostic and prognostic information to NT-proBNP in acute heart failure, but offers unique independent prognostic value in patients with acute exacerbation of COPD.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MR-proANP may add prognostic value in AECOPD; hypothesis-generating for acute dyspnea and requires validation before clinical use.
Purpose: To compare the diagnostic and prognostic value of mid-regional pro-ANP (MR-proANP) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in patients with acute dyspnea.Methods: MR-proANP and NT-proBNP were measured with commercial immunoassays at hospital admission (n = 313), on day 2 (n = 234), and before discharge (n = 91) and compared for diagnosing acute heart failure (HF; n = 143) and to predict mortality among patients with acute HF and acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD; n = 84) separately.Results: The correlation coefficient between MR-proANP and NT-proBNP was 0.89 (p < 0.001) and the receiver-operating area under the curve (AUC) was 0.85 (95% CI 0.81–0.89) for MR-proANP and 0.86 (0.82–0.90) for NT-proBNP to diagnose acute HF. During a median follow-up of 816 days, mortality rates were 46% in acute HF patients and 42% in AECOPD patients. After adjustment for other risk variables by multivariate Cox regression analysis, MR-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations were associated with mortality in patients with acute HF, but only MR-proANP were associated with mortality among patients with AECOPD: hazard ratio (lnMR-proANP) 1.98 (95% CI 1.17–3.34).Conclusion: MR-proANP and NT-proBNP concentrations provide similar diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with acute HF. In contrast to NT-proBNP, MR-proANP measurements also provided independent prognostic information in AECOPD patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pervez et al. (2018) conducted an observational in Acute dyspnea (acute heart failure and AECOPD) (n=313). MR-proANP and NT-proBNP was evaluated on Mortality among patients with AECOPD (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.17-3.34). MR-proANP and NT-proBNP provided similar diagnostic accuracy for acute heart failure, but only MR-proANP was independently associated with mortality in AECOPD patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: