Key result
An analysis of 813 participants from the CARE-HF trial was conducted to determine the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on complications and death in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients.
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy reduce complications and death in diabetic compared with nondiabetic heart failure patients?
RCT (n=813)
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy reduce complications and death in diabetic compared with nondiabetic heart failure patients?
CRT benefit in diabetic HF patients remains unclear from this cohort analysis; leaves open differential efficacy versus nondiabetics.
Diabetes is a well-known and important risk factor for heart disease, including heart failure (1–4). Despite improvements in pharmacologic treatment, many patients with heart failure have severe and persistent symptoms, and their prognosis remains poor (5,6). While most recent data indicate a higher mortality rate in diabetic patients with heart failure compared with nondiabetic patients (7–9), it is unresolved whether this effect might be limited to patients with ischemic heart disease and/or patients on insulin therapy (10–13). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) reduces symptoms and improves left ventricular function and prognosis in many patients with moderate-to-severe heart failure due to systolic dysfunction and cardiac dyssynchrony (14–19). The pathophysiology underlying heart failure in diabetic patients differs from that in nondiabetic patients and is generally considered more progressive. Thus, direct and indirect effects of diabetes on myopathic mechanisms might influence the response of heart failure patients to CRT. We conducted an analysis of the 813 participants of the Cardiac Resynchronisation in Heart Failure (CARE-HF) trial to determine the effect of CRT on the risk of complications and death in diabetic compared with nondiabetic heart failure patients. We also tested the hypothesis that diabetes has a prognostic impact in patients with heart failure. The CARE-HF trial (14,20–22) investigated the effects of cardiac resynchronization on morbidity and mortality in patients receiving standard pharmacologic therapy …
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hoppe et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in Severe Heart Failure (n=813). Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) vs. Standard pharmacologic therapy was evaluated on Risk of complications and death. An analysis of 813 participants from the CARE-HF trial was conducted to determine the effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy on complications and death in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: