Key result
Cardiac resynchronization therapy in diabetic patients with heart failure yielded similar any-cause death rates compared to nondiabetic patients (16.7% vs 14.0%, P=0.72).
Why the study?
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy provide similar functional improvements and clinical outcomes in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with heart failure?
Cohort (n=68)
Does cardiac resynchronization therapy provide similar functional improvements and clinical outcomes in diabetic versus nondiabetic patients with heart failure?
Cardiac resynchronization therapy provides comparable functional improvements and long-term clinical outcomes in heart failure patients regardless of diabetes status.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support CRT in diabetic HF patients; leaves open need for randomized confirmation.
AIMS: To compare functional and structural changes of the left ventricle and long-term clinical outcomes in diabetic and nondiabetic patients with heart failure undergoing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). METHODS: Sixty-eight patients with heart failure undergoing CRT were included: 18 were diabetic patients and 50 nondiabetic patients. The CRT eligibility was established by echocardiographic assessments. RESULTS: CRT improved ventricular geometry and dyssynchrony in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients, with no significant difference in the magnitude of the effects on the left ventricular function. Over a median follow-up of 30.6 ± 6.2 months, there were no significant differences in the rates of any cause death (16.7 vs. 14.0%, P = 0.72), cardiac death (11.1 vs. 8.0%, P = 0.65) and heart rehospitalization (5.6 vs. 6.0%, P = 1.0), between diabetic and nondiabetic patients, respectively. Diabetes was not found to be an independent factor associated with worse clinical outcome. CONCLUSION: Resynchronization therapy provided significant functional and hemodynamic improvements in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Long-term prognosis in heart failure patients with diabetes was comparable with that in those without diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Santangelo et al. (2010) conducted a cohort in Heart failure (n=68). Cardiac resynchronization therapy in diabetic patients vs. Nondiabetic patients was evaluated on Any cause death (p=0.72). Cardiac resynchronization therapy in diabetic patients with heart failure yielded similar any-cause death rates compared to nondiabetic patients (16.7% vs 14.0%, P=0.72).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: