Key result
LBBAP successfully treats post-myectomy conduction block in 90% of patients, whereas HBP fails.
Why the study?
Septal myectomy for obstructive HCM is associated with conduction block, but its electrophysiological characteristics have not been well characterized, leaving the feasibility and safety of HBP and LBBAP unclear.
Is His bundle pacing or left bundle branch area pacing feasible and effective for correcting conduction block in patients following septal myectomy?
Observational (n=10)
Is His bundle pacing or left bundle branch area pacing feasible and effective for correcting conduction block in patients following septal myectomy?
Absolute Event Rate: 90% vs 0%
p-value: p=<.001
Left bundle branch area pacing, but not His bundle pacing, is a feasible physiological pacing strategy for patients with infra-Hisian conduction block following septal myectomy for hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
LBBAP may be feasible for post-myectomy conduction block when His bundle pacing fails; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation before practice change.
INTRODUCTION: Septal myectomy for obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is associated with conduction block; however, the electrophysiological characteristics of conduction block have not been well characterized. The aim of study was to assess the feasibility and safety of His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with septal myectomy-associated conduction block. METHODS AND RESULTS: Patients with HCM and indications for pacing or cardiac resynchronization therapy after septal myectomy were included. Electrophysiological mapping was performed to identify the site of block. The success rates and pacing characteristics of HBP and LBBAP were also recorded. The echocardiographic data and complications were documented and tracked during follow-up. Ten patients with atrioventricular block (AVB) or left bundle branch block (LBBB) post-myectomy were included in the study. The site of block was infranodal in the nine patients with AVB. HBP failed due to the lack of distal His bundle capture (N = 7) or LBBB correction (N = 3). LBBAP was successful in nine patients and failed in one. QRS duration narrowed from 163.3 ± 16.6 ms after surgery to 123.6 ± 15.8 ms during LBBAP (p < .001). The mean depth of the leads was 13.3 ± 4.0 mm (range from 10 to 20 mm). At a mean follow-up of 5.3 ± 3.9 months, pacing parameters and left ventricular ejection fraction remained stable. CONCLUSIONS: Electrophysiological mapping revealed that the site of block was infra-Hisian and not correctable with HBP in patients with HCM post-myectomy. LBBAP appears to be a more feasible physiological strategy for these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zheng et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with septal myectomy-associated conduction block (n=10). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) vs. His bundle pacing (HBP) was evaluated on Procedural success rate and QRS duration narrowing (p=<.001). Left bundle branch area pacing successfully treated post-myectomy conduction block in 90% of patients and narrowed QRS duration from 163.3 to 123.6 ms (p<.001), whereas His bundle pacing failed.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: