Key result
Water-based cycling matches land-based cycling for SEVR reduction but improves stroke volume and myocardial efficiency.
Why the study?
Although water-based exercise is widely recommended, little information is available regarding its influence on cardiac workload and myocardial oxygen supply-to-demand.
Does water-based cycling exercise improve cardiac energy efficiency compared to land-based exercise in healthy men?
Does water-based cycling exercise improve cardiac energy efficiency compared to land-based exercise in healthy men?
Water-based exercise provides better myocardial energy efficiency and higher stroke volume than land-based exercise at matched oxygen consumption in healthy men.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Water-based cycling may improve myocardial efficiency versus land-based exercise in healthy men; hypothesis-generating for clinical populations and outcomes.
Although water-based exercise is one of the most recommended forms of physical activity, little information is available regarding its influence on cardiac workload and myocardial oxygen supply-to-demand. To address this question, we compared subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR, the ratio of myocardial oxygen supply-to-demand), cardiac inotropy ( via the maximum rate of aortic pressure rise [dP/dT max ]), and stroke volume (SV, via a Modelflow method) responses between water- and land-based exercise. Eleven healthy men aged 24 ± 1 years underwent mild- to moderate-intensity cycling exercise in water (WC) and on land (LC) consecutively on separate days. In WC, cardiorespiratory variables were monitored during leg cycling exercise (30, 45, and 60 rpm of cadence for 5 min each) using an immersible stationary bicycle. In LC, each participant performed a cycling exercise at the oxygen consumption (VO 2 ) matched to the WC. SEVR and dP/dT max were obtained by using the pulse wave analysis from peripheral arterial pressure waveforms. With increasing exercise intensity, SEVR exhibited similar progressive reductions in WC (from 211 ± 44 to 75 ± 11%) and LC (from 215 ± 34 to 78 ± 9%) (intensity effect: P < 0.001) without their conditional differences. WC showed higher SV at rest and a smaller increase in SV than LC (environment-intensity interaction: P = 0.009). The main effect of environment on SV was significant ( P = 0.002), but that of dP/dT max was not ( P = 0.155). SV was correlated with dP/dT max ( r = 0.717, P < 0.001). When analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) was performed with dP/dT max as a covariate, the environment effect on SV was still significant ( P < 0.001), although environment-intensity interaction was abolished ( P = 0.543). These results suggest that water-based exercise does not elicit unfavorable myocardial oxygen supply-to-demand balance at mild-to-moderate intensity compared with land-based exercise. Rather, water-based exercise may achieve higher SV and better myocardial energy efficiency than land-based exercise, even at the same inotropic force.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fukuie et al. (2021) studied Healthy (n=11). Water-based cycling vs. Land-based cycling was evaluated on Subendocardial viability ratio (SEVR) at highest exercise intensity (p=0.800). Water-based cycling elicited similar progressive reductions in subendocardial viability ratio compared to land-based cycling, but achieved higher stroke volume and better myocardial energy efficiency.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: