Why the study?
Does prazosin reduce chest pain episodes and ST-segment deviations in men with variant angina?
Does prazosin reduce chest pain episodes and ST-segment deviations in men with variant angina?
In a small randomized crossover trial, the alpha-adrenergic blocker prazosin showed no beneficial effect on symptoms or ischemic ECG changes in patients with variant angina.
Prazosin offers no benefit in variant angina; challenges theoretical support for alpha-adrenergic blockade.
Recent reports have shown that beta-adrenergic blockade may exacerbate variant angina. On theoretical grounds, alpha-adrenergic blockade may be beneficial in these patients. To test this hypothesis, we assessed the efficacy of prazosin, an alpha-adrenergic blocking agent, in six men, mean age 49 years, with variant angina. Prazosin, 14.0 +/- 2.4 mg/day (mean +/- SD) in three equal doses, was compared with placebo in a double-blind, randomized, double-crossover trial lasting 4 1/2 months: 2 weeks of open-label prazosin followed by four 1-month periods of blinded alternating therapy. No other vasoactive medications were administered during the study. Prazosin reduced sitting systolic arterial pressure from 145 +/- 18 to 127 +/- 16 mm Hg (p = 0.02), but exerted no effect on diastolic arterial pressure or heart rate. Prazosin did not change the weekly number of episodes of chest pain (2.5 +/- 2.3 with placebo vs 3.1 +/- 3.0 with prazosin, NS), nitroglycerin tablets used (3.9 +/- 3.7 with placebo vs 4.6 +/- 4.2 with prazosin, NS), or transient ST-segment deviations (by calibrated two-channel Holter monitoring for 24 hours/week throughout the study) (6.5 +/- 10.1 with placebo vs 11.8 +/- 17.4 with prazosin, NS). During prazosin therapy, three patients had orthostatic dizziness and one patient had headache. Thus, in a long-term, randomized, double-blind trial, prazosin exerted no obvious beneficial effect in patients with variant angina.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Winniford et al. (1983) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: