Key result
Epicardial fat thickness measured by MDCT increased by 27% during systole compared to diastole (6.2 vs 4.9 mm, P=0.04), with thickness >5 mm predicted by age >50 and coronary artery disease.
Why the study?
What are the patterns, variations, and clinical predictors of epicardial fat thickness measured by multidetector computed tomography?
Observational (n=40)
What are the patterns, variations, and clinical predictors of epicardial fat thickness measured by multidetector computed tomography?
Epicardial fat thickness >5 mm is common in areas targeted during epicardial ablation, increases during systole, and is predicted by age >50 and coronary artery disease, suggesting preprocedural CT may facilitate ablation planning.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
MDCT epicardial fat variation associates with age and CAD; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change ablation planning.
BACKGROUND: A significant number of ventricular tachycardia circuits are located close to the epicardial surface and are amendable to epicardial ablation. Epicardial fat often interferes with substrate mapping and ablation, though little is known regarding the distribution of fat and its fluctuation with the cardiac cycle. METHODS: We studied 40 patients who underwent a 64-slice multidetector computed tomography in order to describe patterns of epicardial fat distribution, variation during cardiac cycle, and clinical predictors of epicardial fat. Multiplanar reconstructions were analyzed during systole and diastole in six cross-sections. Epicardial fat thickness was measured across multiple wall segments in each view. RESULTS: Epicardial fat was found to be thicker in areas overlying coronary vasculature (7.8 ± 2.6 mm vs 3.5 ± 0.9 mm, P = 0.001), along with the right ventricular wall (3.9 ± 0.8 mm vs 2.6 ± 0.6 mm, P = 0.001) and the ventricular base (6.1 ± 1.7 mm vs 4.6 ± 1.6 mm, P < 0.01). Epicardial fat thickness increased 27% during systole as compared to diastole (4.9 ± 2.7 mm vs 6.2 ± 3.0 mm, P = 0.04). Variation with cardiac cycle was most evident along the right ventricular wall (3.9 ± 0.8 mm vs 5.0 ± 1.3 mm, P = 0.001) and nonvascular areas (P = 0.001), especially at the ventricular base (3.7 ± 1.1 mm vs 5.3 ± 1.5 mm, P = 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression, we found that age >50 years (P = 0.031) and coronary artery disease (P = 0.023) were statistically correlated with epicardial fat >5-mm thickness and body mass index > 33 (P = 0.052) nearly so. CONCLUSIONS: Baseline epicardial fat thickness >5 mm is common in areas typically targeted during epicardial ablation and further increases during the cardiac cycle. Simple clinical characteristics can identify patients with >5 mm epicardial fat in which preprocedural computed tomography imaging and three-dimensional fat map reconstruction may facilitate epicardial ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sourwine et al. (2017) conducted an observational in Ventricular tachycardia (epicardial ablation candidates) (n=40). 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) was evaluated on Epicardial fat thickness during systole compared to diastole (p=0.04). Epicardial fat thickness measured by MDCT increased by 27% during systole compared to diastole (6.2 vs 4.9 mm, P=0.04), with thickness >5 mm predicted by age >50 and coronary artery disease.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: