Key result
High-dose spironolactone yields unexpectedly low active metabolite levels, potentially explaining lack of acute heart failure efficacy.
Why the study?
In ATHENA-HF, high-dose spironolactone did not improve efficacy endpoints over usual care in acute HF, leading investigators to hypothesize that low concentrations of active metabolites contributed to these neutral results.
Does high-dose spironolactone (100 mg daily) achieve steady-state active metabolite concentrations by 48 hours compared to usual care in patients with acute heart failure?
RCT
Does high-dose spironolactone (100 mg daily) achieve steady-state active metabolite concentrations by 48 hours compared to usual care in patients with acute heart failure?
p-value: p=<0.0001
Delayed achievement of steady-state active metabolite concentrations may explain the lack of efficacy of high-dose spironolactone observed in the ATHENA-HF trial.
High-dose spironolactone dosing in acute HF warrants pharmacokinetic caution; challenges rapid-onset assumptions from chronic data and leaves open optimized regimens for testing.
AIMS: In Aldosterone Targeted Neurohormonal Combined with Natriuresis Therapy in Heart Failure (ATHENA-HF), high-dose spironolactone (100 mg daily) did not improve efficacy endpoints over usual care [placebo or continued low-dose spironolactone (25 mg daily) in patients already receiving spironolactone] in the treatment of acute heart failure (HF). We hypothesized that low concentrations of the long-acting active metabolites of spironolactone [canrenone and 7α-thiomethylspironolactone (7α-TMS)] in the high-dose group could have contributed to these neutral results. METHODS AND RESULTS: In patients randomized to high-dose spironolactone not previously treated with spironolactone (high-dose-naïve, n = 112), concentrations of canrenone and 7α-TMS increased at 48 and 96 h compared to baseline, and between 48 and 96 h (all P < 0.005), indicating that steady-state concentrations had not been reached by 48 h. In patients previously on low-dose, high-dose spironolactone (high-dose-previous, n = 37), concentrations of canrenone increased at 48 and 96 h compared to baseline (both P < 0.0005), with a marginal increase between 48 and 96 h (P = 0.0507). At 48 h, both high-dose groups had higher concentrations of both metabolites than the low-dose spironolactone group (P < 0.0001). Moreover, concentrations of both metabolites were higher in high-dose-previous vs. high-dose-naïve patients (P < 0.01), indicating that previous spironolactone use was significant, and that steady-state has not been reached in high-dose-naïve patients at 48 h. We found limited and inconsistent evidence of correlation between metabolite concentrations and endpoints. CONCLUSIONS: Lower-than-anticipated concentrations of spironolactone active metabolites were observed for at least 48 h in the high-dose spironolactone group and may have contributed to the absence of pharmacological effects of spironolactone in the ATHENA-HF trial.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Denus et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Acute heart failure. High-dose spironolactone vs. Usual care (placebo or continued low-dose spironolactone 25 mg daily) was evaluated on Concentrations of long-acting active metabolites of spironolactone (canrenone and 7α-TMS) at 48 and 96 hours (p=<0.0001). High-dose spironolactone (100 mg daily) yielded lower-than-anticipated active metabolite concentrations for at least 48 hours, potentially explaining its lack of efficacy in acute heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: