Key result
Fractionated electrogram area strongly correlates with prolonged LA activation time and slower wave propagation velocity.
Why the study?
The clinical significance of left atrial local electrogram fractionation after restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with AF has not been elucidated.
Does quantitative analysis of fractionated electrogram area correlate with markers of left atrial electrical remodeling in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Observational (n=40)
Does quantitative analysis of fractionated electrogram area correlate with markers of left atrial electrical remodeling in patients with atrial fibrillation?
Effect estimate: R = 0.69-0.92
p-value: p=<.0001
Quantitative analysis of fractionated electrogram area, alongside low-voltage area, correlates with left atrial activation time and wave propagation velocity, providing a potential marker for left atrial electrical remodeling in AF patients.
May aid assessment of left atrial remodeling in AF; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background The clinical significance of left atrial local electrogram fractionation after restoration of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has not been elucidated. Methods We evaluated ultrahigh‐resolution maps of the left atrium (LA) during RA pacing acquired after pulmonary vein isolation in 40 patients with AF. The association between low‐voltage area (LVA, <0.5 mV), fractionated electrogram area (FEA, the highlighted area with LUMIPOINT™ Complex Activation), the interval from onset of LA activation to wavefront collision at the mitral isthmus (LA activation time), and wave propagation velocity (WPV) was evaluated quantitatively. Results The total LVA, total FEA with ≥5.0 peaks or ≥7.0 peaks were 7.0 ± 7.9 cm 2 , 15.9 ± 12.9 cm 2 , and 5.2 ± 7.5 cm 2 , respectively. These areas were predominantly observed in the anteroseptal region. Total LVA, total FEA with ≥5.0 peaks, and total FEA with ≥5.0 peaks in the normal voltage area (NVA: ≥0.5 mV) correlated with LA activation time ( R = 0.69, 0.75, and 0.71; each p < .0001). In the anterior wall, these areas correlated with regional mean WPV ( R = −0.75, −0.83, and − 0.55; each p < .0001) and the extent of slow conduction area (SCA) with WPV <0.3 m/s ( R = 0.89, 0.84, 0.33; p < .0001 for LVA and FEA, p < .05 for FEA located in NVA). The anterior wall FEA with ≥7.0 peaks and that in the NVA showed a better correlation in predicting anterior wall SCA ( R = 0.92 and 0.86, each p < .0001). Conclusion Quantitative analysis of FEA together with LVA may facilitate the assessment of LA electrical remodeling.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sekihara et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=40). Ultrahigh-resolution mapping of left atrium during right atrial pacing was evaluated on Correlation between low-voltage area, fractionated electrogram area, left atrial activation time, and wave propagation velocity (R = 0.69-0.92, p=<.0001). Total fractionated electrogram area with ≥5.0 peaks strongly correlated with left atrial activation time (R=0.75, p<0.0001) and regional mean wave propagation velocity (R=-0.83, p<0.0001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: