Key result
Rate-responsive pacing significantly improved peak heart rate (149 vs 129 bpm) and peak oxygen uptake (18.9 vs 15.4 mL/kg/min) compared to unpaced mode in heart transplant recipients (P≤0.05).
Why the study?
Does rate-responsive pacing improve peak heart rate and exercise capacity in heart transplant recipients?
Does rate-responsive pacing improve peak heart rate and exercise capacity in heart transplant recipients?
Absolute Event Rate: 149% vs 129%
p-value: p=≤ 0.05
Rate-responsive pacing significantly improves peak heart rate and exercise capacity in heart transplant recipients compared to reliance on circulating catecholamines alone.
May support rate-responsive pacing in heart transplant recipients; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Background: Chronotropic incompetence is one cause of diminished exercise capacity in heart transplant recipients. If reinnervation occurs, it often is late after transplantation and is not always accompanied by functional improvements in peak heart rate and appropriate tachycardia during exercise. To determine the efficacy of rate-responsive pacing on peak heart rate and exercise capacity, the authors studied eight male heart transplant recipients (age 57 ± 12 years; 23 ± 9 months after transplantation) that had either atrial or dual-chambered pacemakers. Methods: All subjects completed two maximal graded exercise tests (GXT) using the Naughton treadmill protocol. During the first GXT, pacemakers were programmed for bradycardia support only and without rate responsiveness (unpaced). After a 14-day regimen of beta blockade with metoprolol to nullify the influence of circulating catecholamines on heart rate, subjects performed the second GXT with pacemakers programmed to respond optimally in the rate-responsive mode (paced). Results: Peak heart rate (149 versus 129 bpm), peak oxygen uptake (18.9 versus 15.4 mL/kg/min), treadmill time to exhaustion (14.6 versus 12.4 min), and minute ventilation (76.7 versus 66.2 L/min) were significantly increased (P ≤ 0.05) during the paced versus unpaced GXT. Conclusions: The results of this study demonstrate that chronotropic support of the transplanted heart using a rate-responsive pacemaker, with activity-based sensors programmed for maximal sensitivity, improves both peak heart rate and exercise capacity in heart transplant recipients significantly more than circulating catecholamines alone.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Braith et al. (2000) studied Heart transplant recipients (n=8). Rate-responsive pacing vs. Unpaced (bradycardia support only) was evaluated on Peak heart rate (bpm) (p=≤ 0.05). Rate-responsive pacing significantly improved peak heart rate (149 vs 129 bpm) and peak oxygen uptake (18.9 vs 15.4 mL/kg/min) compared to unpaced mode in heart transplant recipients (P≤0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: