Key result
Exercise testing in 12 cardiac transplant recipients revealed that only 1 (8.3%) had an appropriate chronotropic response, indicating recipient atrial triggered pacing is rarely practical.
Why the study?
Does the recipient atrial remnant exhibit normal chronotropic response to exercise to support its use for triggered pacing in orthotopic cardiac transplant recipients?
Observational (n=12)
Does the recipient atrial remnant exhibit normal chronotropic response to exercise to support its use for triggered pacing in orthotopic cardiac transplant recipients?
Recipient atrial triggered pacing is rarely practical after orthotopic cardiac transplantation due to frequent rhythm abnormalities and chronotropic incompetence in the recipient atrial remnant.
Limits recipient atrial triggered pacing feasibility post-transplant; small cross-sectional data leaves open prospective confirmation in larger cohorts.
The assumption that the recipient atrial remnant in the cardiac transplant recipient is normal has led to the suggestion that it is an appropriate trigger for permanent pacing in transplant recipients who need pacing or to restore chronotropic competence and/or mechanical synchrony of the composite atrium. We examined the chronotropic response to exercise in 12 orthotopic cardiac transplant recipients (mean age 49 years) at a mean time of 17 months posttransplantation. Recipient and donor atrial rates were noted and compared and chronotropic competence determined. Two of 12 recipient atrial remnants were in atrial fibrillation. Only six of the remaining 10 recipient atria exhibited chronotropic competence. Seven of 10 recipient atria had rates higher than that of the donor. Only four of ten recipient atria in sinus rhythm satisfied both criteria. Two of these had abnormally high atrial responses early into exercise. Of the remaining two, only one recipient atrial remnant demonstrated a > or = 20% increase in heart rate above that of the donor at peak exercise. Hence only 1 of 12 (8.3%) transplant recipients potentially could benefit from recipient atrial triggered pacing. While recipient atrial triggered pacing is an attractive theoretical concept for restoring chronotropic competence following orthotopic cardiac transplantation, it may rarely be practical because the recipient atrial remnant displays rhythm abnormalities, chronotropic incompetence, and abnormalities in its exercise response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Holt et al. (1998) conducted an observational in Orthotopic cardiac transplantation (n=12). Exercise was evaluated on Chronotropic response to exercise. Exercise testing in 12 cardiac transplant recipients revealed that only 1 (8.3%) had an appropriate chronotropic response, indicating recipient atrial triggered pacing is rarely practical.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: