Key result
Small ring-electrodes yield ~140% higher unipolar amplitude than larger tip electrodes alongside rapid distance decay.
Why the study?
Intracardiac unipolar and bipolar electrogram characteristics depend on electrode design and configuration, motivating an assessment of how electrode design and distance affect electrograms to determine a far-field versus near-field cut-off.
Does electrode design and distance from the myocardial electric source affect unipolar and bipolar voltage electrograms during left atrial mapping?
Observational (n=25)
Does electrode design and distance from the myocardial electric source affect unipolar and bipolar voltage electrograms during left atrial mapping?
Small ring electrodes yield higher unipolar amplitudes than larger tip electrodes, and a rapid decay of electrogram features with distance suggests a near-field cut-off of <4 mm from the tissue.
Ring electrodes may enhance near-field detection in LA mapping; hypothesis-generating for optimized catheter designs pending prospective trials.
Background The characteristics of intracardiac unipolar and bipolar voltage electrograms (EGM) acquired by electrophysiological catheters depend on the electrode design and configuration.The aim of the study was to assess the impact of electrode design and distance from the myocardial electric source on the unipolar and bipolar intracardiac electrograms recorded with a multi-electrode ablation catheter do deduce a cut-off for far-field versus near-field discrimination. Methods We retrospectively analyzed left atrial electroanatomical maps of 25 patients performed using an ablation catheter with a 4.5 mm tip-, mini- and 2 mm ring electrodes. The unipolar and bipolar EGMs were characterized based on peak-to-peak amplitude, signal duration (width), maximal slope, and relative power of the high frequency spectrum (HF_rel). Distances of the electrode from the tissue were calculated from the electroanatomic reconstruction. Results We analyzed EGMs of 5183 catheter positions. The unipolar EGM of ring electrodes showed an increased amplitude (140%), slope (150%) and HF_rel (16% vs 11%) compared to the tip- and mini-electrodes. In contrast, for bipolar EGM, the tip-ring pair showed the largest amplitude, width, and slope. The median amplitude, slope, and HF_rel for the ring electrodes followed a power-law decay function with distance. A cut-off of 4 mm was determined for far-field versus near-field discrimination. Conclusions We showed a higher unipolar amplitude for small ring-electrodes compared to larger tip electrodes. Furthermore, a rapid decay of the amplitude, slope, and HF_rel with distance could be observed. The decay functions are suggestive for a near-field cut-off distance below 4mm from the tissue.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schlageter et al. (2024) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=25). IntellaNav Mifi OI catheter (tip, ring, and mini-electrodes) vs. Different electrode types and distances was evaluated on Unipolar and bipolar electrogram characteristics (amplitude, width, slope, HF_rel) based on electrode type and distance. Small ring-electrodes demonstrated a 140% higher unipolar amplitude compared to larger tip electrodes, and signal characteristics decayed rapidly with distance, suggesting a near-field cut-off of 4 mm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: