Key result
A personalized IVC ultrasound image did not improve 30-day heart failure treatment adherence scores compared to generic information (11.8 vs 11.7, p=0.90).
Why the study?
Personalized tools relevant to an individual patient's unique characteristics may be an important component of personalized health care.
Does providing a personalized IVC ultrasound image with fluid status explanation improve self-reported treatment adherence in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure?
RCT (n=97)
Does providing a personalized IVC ultrasound image with fluid status explanation improve self-reported treatment adherence in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure?
Absolute Event Rate: 11.8% vs 11.7%
p-value: p=0.90
Providing a personalized IVC ultrasound image with fluid status explanation did not improve 30-day self-reported treatment adherence or clinical outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure.
Personalized tools relevant to an individual patient’s unique characteristics may be an important component of personalized health care. We randomized 97 patients hospitalized with acute decompensated heart failure to receive a printout of an ultrasound image of their inferior vena cava (IVC) with an explanation of how the image is related to their fluid status (n = 50) or to receive no image and only generic heart failure information (n = 47). Adherence to medications, low-sodium diet, and daily weight measurement at baseline and 30 days after discharge were assessed using the Medical Outcomes Study Specific Adherence Scale, modified to a three-item version for heart failure (HF), (MOSSAS-3HF, maximum score = 15, indicating adherence all of the time). The baseline MOSSAS-3HF scores (mean ± standard deviation (SD)) were similar for intervention and control groups (7.4 ± 3.4 vs. 6.4 ± 3.7, p = 0.91). The MOSSAS-3HF scores improved for both groups but were not different at 30 days (11.8 ± 2.8 vs. 11.7 ± 3.0, p = 0.90). Survival without readmission or emergency department (ED) visit at 30 days was similar (82.6% vs. 84.1%, p = 0.85). A personalized HF tool did not affect rates of self-reported HF treatment adherence or survival without readmission or ED visit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Athar et al. (2018) conducted an RCT in acute decompensated heart failure (n=97). Printout of an ultrasound image of their inferior vena cava (IVC) with an explanation vs. No image and only generic heart failure information was evaluated on MOSSAS-3HF score at 30 days (p=0.90). A personalized IVC ultrasound image did not improve 30-day heart failure treatment adherence scores compared to generic information (11.8 vs 11.7, p=0.90).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: