Key result
Gradient-boosting model outperforms logistic regression in predicting emergency colorectal surgery mortality with a 0.814 AUROC.
Why the study?
Accurate mortality risk assessment remains necessary to determine the appropriate allocation of therapeutic resources based on severity in patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery.
Do machine-learning models improve the prediction of in-hospital mortality compared to logistic regression in adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery?
Cohort (n=8,792)
Yes
Do machine-learning models improve the prediction of in-hospital mortality compared to logistic regression in adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 0.814% vs 0.742%
Machine learning models, particularly gradient-boosting decision trees, demonstrate superior performance to logistic regression in predicting in-hospital mortality after emergency colorectal surgery.
May enhance mortality risk prediction after emergency colorectal surgery; leaves open external validation and outcome impact.
Background: Although prognostic factors associated with mortality in patients with emergency colorectal surgery have been identified, an accurate mortality risk assessment is still necessary to determine the range of therapeutic resources in accordance with the severity of patients. We established machine-learning models to predict in-hospital mortality for patients who had emergency colorectal surgery using clinical data at admission and attempted to identify prognostic factors associated with in-hospital mortality. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included adult patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery in 42 hospitals between 2012 and 2020. We employed logistic regression and three supervised machine-learning models: random forests, gradient-boosting decision trees (GBDT), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC) was calculated for each model. The Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) values are also calculated to identify the significant variables in GBDT. Results: There were 8792 patients who underwent emergency colorectal surgery. As a result, the AUROC values of 0.742, 0.782, 0.814, and 0.768 were obtained for logistic regression, random forests, GBDT, and MLP. According to SHAP values, age, colorectal cancer, use of laparoscopy, and some laboratory variables, including serum lactate dehydrogenase serum albumin, and blood urea nitrogen, were significantly associated with in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: We successfully generated a machine-learning prediction model, including GBDT, with the best prediction performance and exploited the potential for use in evaluating in-hospital mortality risk for patients who undergo emergency colorectal surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akabane et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Emergency colorectal surgery (n=8,792). Machine-learning models (GBDT, random forests, MLP) vs. Logistic regression was evaluated on In-hospital mortality prediction (AUROC). A gradient-boosting decision tree model best predicted in-hospital mortality for patients undergoing emergency colorectal surgery, achieving an AUROC of 0.814 compared to 0.742 for logistic regression.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: