Why the study?
Does nitrendipine reduce left ventricular hypertrophy and alter regional blood flow in renovascular hypertensive rats?
Does nitrendipine reduce left ventricular hypertrophy and alter regional blood flow in renovascular hypertensive rats?
In a rat model of renovascular hypertension, 6-week treatment with nitrendipine significantly regressed left ventricular hypertrophy and increased coronary and cerebral blood flow.
Supports preclinical LVH regression data; leaves open clinical translation in human renovascular hypertension.
Nitrendipine, a new calcium entry blocker, was administered to renovascular hypertensive rats (2K1C Goldblatt) (RHR, n = 8) and sham operated control rats (ShC, n = 8) to evaluate the effects on left ventricular hypertrophy and regional blood flow using radioactive microspheres. Nine untreated RHR and 8 untreated ShC served as control groups. After 6 weeks treatment (20 mg/kg subcutaneously, every other day), blood pressure reduced significantly in both RHR and ShC associated with a reduction in total peripheral resistance. Significant reversal of left ventricular hypertrophy was noted in RHR (1278 +/- 41 to 1024 +/- 19 mg, p less than 0.01), but not in ShC. There was a significant relationship between blood pressure and left ventricular mass in both untreated rats (r = 0.955, p less than 0.001) and treated rats (r = 0.729, p less than 0.005). Nitrendipine increased coronary blood flow in RHR (430 +/- 30 to 566 +/- 47 ml/m/100g, p less than 0.05) as well as in ShC (375 +/- 15 to 508 +/- 29 ml/ml/100g, p less than 0.05), without increasing cardiac oxygen demand. Renal blood flow was unchanged, whereas cerebral blood flow was significantly increased in both RHR (128 +/- 6 to 164 +/- 13 ml/m/100g, p less than 0.01) and ShC (124 +/- 7 to 173 +/- 5 ml/m/100g, p less than 0.01). Thus, long treatment of nitrendipine effectively regressed cardiac hypertrophy toward normal. Nitrendipine reduced total peripheral resistance; however, the effects on regional blood flow were not uniform among various organs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (1987) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: