Key result
Enalapril is associated with lower atherogenic and Castelli risk indices in hypertensive metabolic syndrome patients.
Why the study?
The exact impact of ACE inhibitors on surrogate lipid and glycemic markers in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome had not been extensively reported.
Does enalapril improve surrogate glycemic and lipid markers in patients with metabolic syndrome?
Case-Control (n=51)
No
Does enalapril improve surrogate glycemic and lipid markers in patients with metabolic syndrome?
Enalapril use in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome is associated with favorable changes in some surrogate lipid markers (AIP, CRI-I) compared to normotensive controls.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Associated lipid marker improvements with enalapril in metabolic syndrome are hypothesis-generating; leaves open effects on outcomes and need for randomized confirmation.
BACKGROUND: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is a constellation of metabolic disorders, that together, aggravate the cardiovascular, and atherosclerotic risks. ACE inhibitors class, used for managing hypertension in MetS, induces favorable effects on glycemic control and insulin action on tissues as well as reducing all-cause mortality in HT patients. However, exploring changes associated with ACEI use and the exact impact of ACE inhibitors in hypertensive MetS patients on surrogate lipid and glycemic markers has not been reported in previous research extensively, if any. AIM: The aim of the study was to assess metabolic impact of ACE inhibition in MetS patients in terms of surrogate glucose-, insulin-, and lipid fraction-based markers. METHODS: A case–control study involving subjects diagnosed with MetS was conducted. Two study groups were involved: Hypertensive MetS patients maintained on Enalapril (n = 27), and normotensive control patients (n = 24). Triglyceride and glucose index (TyG index), triglyceride glucose-body mass index (TyG-BMI), serum insulin by TG (InsuTAG), atherogenic index of plasma (AIP), Castelli risk index-I (CRI-I) and -II (CRI-II), were calculated. RESULTS: Compared to controls, InsuTAG and TyG index were non-significantly different, AIP was significantly lower, TyG-BMI was significantly higher and CRI-I was significantly lower while CRI- II was non-significantly higher, in the treatment group. CONCLUSION: Despite controversy and scarcity of evidence in the literature, benefits of using enalapril on important components of MetS, indirectly assessed by surrogate markers, were shown in the current study and using ACE inhibitor in hypertensive MetS patients probably minimized metabolic and cardiovascular risk.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zainal et al. (2022) conducted a case-control in Metabolic syndrome (MetS) (n=51). Enalapril vs. Normotensive control patients was evaluated on Atherogenic index of plasma (AIP) (p=<0.05). Enalapril treatment in hypertensive patients with metabolic syndrome significantly reduced the atherogenic index of plasma and Castelli risk index-I compared to normotensive controls.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: