Key result
Wireless PA pressure monitoring is linked to ~87% fewer HF hospitalizations versus the prior year.
Why the study?
Although pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) monitoring reduces HF hospitalizations and improves quality of life in NYHA class III HF, its impact on outcomes and health spending in a Canadian ambulatory cohort had not been evaluated.
Does wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring reduce healthcare costs and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with NYHA class III heart failure?
Cohort (n=20)
No
Does wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring reduce healthcare costs and heart failure hospitalizations in patients with NYHA class III heart failure?
Wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring in NYHA class III heart failure patients significantly reduced heart failure hospitalizations and emergency room visits while remaining cost-neutral in a Canadian publicly funded healthcare system.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support remote monitoring in NYHA III HF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation before practice change.
BackgroundPulmonary artery pressure (PAP) monitoring reduces heart failure (HF) hospitalizations (HFHs) and improves quality of life in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III HF. We evaluated the impact of PAP monitoring on outcomes and health spending in a Canadian ambulatory HF cohort.MethodsTwenty NYHA III HF patients underwent wireless PAP implantation at Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, Alberta. Baseline, and 3-, 6-, 9-, and 12-month assessments of laboratory parameters, hemodynamics, 6-minute walk text and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire scores were collected. Healthcare costs 1 year pre- and post-implantation were collected from administrative databases.ResultsMean age was 70.6 years; 45% were female. Results were as follows: an 88% reduction in emergency room visits (P = 0.0009); an 87% reduction in HFHs (P < 0.0003); a 29% reduction in heart function clinic visits (P = 0.033), and a 178% increase in nurse calls (P < 0.0002). Questionnaire and 6-minute walk test scores at baseline vs last follow-up were 45.4 vs 48.4 (P = 0.48) and 364.4 vs 402.8 m (P = 0.58), respectively. Mean PAP at baseline vs follow-up was 31.5 vs 24.8 mm Hg (P = 0.005). NYHA class improved by at least one class in 85% of patients. Mean measurable HF-related spending preimplantation was CAD$29,814 per patient per year and postimplantation was CAD$25,642 per patient per year (including device cost).ConclusionsPAP monitoring demonstrated reductions in HFHs, and emergency room and heart function clinic visits, with improvements in NYHA class. Although further economic evaluation is needed, these results support the use of PAP monitoring as an effective and cost-neutral tool in HF management in appropriately selected patients in a publicly funded healthcare system.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gibson et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Symptomatic Heart Failure (n=20). Wireless pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) monitoring vs. 1 year pre-implantation (historical control) was evaluated on Heart failure hospitalizations (HFHs) (87% reduction, p=<0.0003). Wireless pulmonary artery pressure monitoring reduced heart failure hospitalizations by 87% (P<0.0003) and emergency room visits by 88% (P=0.0009) compared to the year prior to implantation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: