Key result
Pilsicainide induced ventricular arrhythmias in 5 of 28 patients (17.9%) with Brugada syndrome, but this finding may not be useful for risk stratification.
Why the study?
Does pilsicainide-induced ventricular arrhythmia predict clinical outcomes in patients with Brugada syndrome?
Observational (n=28)
Does pilsicainide-induced ventricular arrhythmia predict clinical outcomes in patients with Brugada syndrome?
Pilsicainide-induced ventricular arrhythmias in Brugada syndrome patients do not correlate with long-term clinical outcomes and should not be used for risk stratification.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pilsicainide-induced arrhythmias should not guide risk stratification in Brugada syndrome; leaves open the need for validated predictors in prospective cohorts.
BACKGROUND: In patients with Brugada syndrome, class I antiarrhythmic drugs can trigger ventricular arrhythmias (VA). The incidence and initial characteristics of VA that developed after pilsicainide was examined in 28 patients with Brugada-type electrocardiographic (ECG) abnormalities and with a positive response in the pilsicainide test. The clinical outcome was also compared between patients with and without pilsicainide-induced VA. METHODS AND RESULTS: In all patients, pilsicainide increased ST segment elevation and accentuated type 1 ECG changes. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) developed in 3 patients and premature ventricular complexes (PVC) in 2 other patients. These 5 patients (group I) had higher ST segment elevation in lead V2 on the ECG at baseline and after pilsicainide and showed a longer QTc interval after pilsicainide than the other 23 patients (group II). However, there was no difference between the 2 groups regarding incidence of prior cardiac events, results of signal-averaged ECG, HV interval, inducibility of ventricular fibrillation by programmed electrical stimulation, or QRS duration. In 1 patient, PVC originated from 3 sites, 2 of which triggered polymorphic VT. The right ventricular (RV) outflow tract was the origin of 2 types of PVC, and other RV sites of 5 other types. During a 45 +/- 37 months follow-up, polymorphic VT recurred in 2 patients in group II. CONCLUSIONS: Pilsicainide induced VA in some patients with Brugada syndrome, but this result may not be used as a parameter of the risk stratification of Brugada syndrome. Multiple PVC induced by pilsicainide and triggering polymorphic VT originated from several RV sites is an important factor when considering patients for treatment with catheter ablation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chinushi et al. (2007) conducted an observational in Brugada syndrome (n=28). Pilsicainide vs. Patients without pilsicainide-induced ventricular arrhythmias was evaluated on Incidence of pilsicainide-induced ventricular arrhythmias. Pilsicainide induced ventricular arrhythmias in 5 of 28 patients (17.9%) with Brugada syndrome, but this finding may not be useful for risk stratification.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: