Key result
Higher visit-to-visit MAP variability linked to ~50% greater IHD risk in hypertensive patients.
Why the study?
Blood pressure variability is a recognized cardiovascular risk factor, but the association between mean arterial pressure variability and risks of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke required evaluation in hypertensive patients in Thailand.
Does higher visit-to-visit mean arterial pressure variability increase the risk of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke in hypertensive patients?
Cohort (n=101,661)
Yes
Does higher visit-to-visit mean arterial pressure variability increase the risk of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke in hypertensive patients?
Higher visit-to-visit mean arterial pressure variability is strongly associated with an increased risk of ischemic heart disease and ischemic stroke in hypertensive patients, suggesting BP variability should be incorporated into management strategies.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Should not yet change hypertension management; leaves open whether targeting MAP variability improves ischemic outcomes.
Background: Blood pressure (BP) variability has been recognized as a significant risk factor for cardiovascular diseases (CVD). We aim to evaluate the association between mean arterial pressure (MAP) variability and the increased risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD) and ischemic stroke (IS) among hypertensive patients in Thailand. Methods: We analyzed data from the Thailand DM/HT study, which included hypertensive patients nationwide in 2014 to 2015 and 2018. MAP variability was computed based on the MAP values across 3 visits within 1 year and expressed as standard deviation (SD). We used multivariable log-binomial regression models to evaluate the associations between MAP variability and the risk of IHD and IS. Results: Among 92 854 individuals, 594 new-onset IHD events (0.64%) and 187 IS incidents among 95 486 individuals (0.20%). Compared to the lowest quartile (Q1), higher quartiles of SD were associated with increased risk of IHD, with adjusted risk ratios (aRRs) of 1.06 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.82-1.38) for Q2, 1.35 (95% CI: 1.06-1.72) for Q3, and 1.50 (95% CI: 1.18-1.90) for Q4. Similarly, higher SD quartiles raised the risk of IS, with aRRs of 1.35 (95% CI: 0.83-2.20) for Q2, 1.56 (95% CI: 0.98-2.48) for Q3, and 1.97 (95% CI: 1.26-3.07) for Q4, when compared to Q1. Conclusion: Our study demonstrated that higher visit-to-visit MAP variability in hypertensive patients was strongly associated with an increased risk of CVD. We emphasize the importance of incorporating BP variability into management strategies to help reduce the risk of CVD in these patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sakboonyarat et al. (2025) conducted a cohort in Hypertension (n=101,661). Highest quartile of visit-to-visit mean arterial pressure (MAP) variability (SD Q4) vs. Lowest quartile of MAP variability (SD Q1) was evaluated on Incidence of ischemic heart disease (IHD) (aRR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18-1.90, p=0.001). The highest quartile of visit-to-visit mean arterial pressure variability significantly increased the risk of ischemic heart disease by 50% (aRR 1.50) and ischemic stroke by 97% (aRR 1.97) compared to the lowest quartile in hypertensive patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: