Key result
High within-visit systolic blood pressure variability was associated with increased odds of stroke (OR 1.8), but this relationship was no longer significant after adjusting for age and covariates.
Why the study?
Long-term systolic blood pressure variability increases cardiovascular risk, but little is known about the association between within-visit variability, stroke, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular death.
Does high within-visit SBP variability increase the risk of stroke, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular mortality in adults?
Cross-Sectional (n=27,987)
Does high within-visit SBP variability increase the risk of stroke, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular mortality in adults?
While within-visit SBP variability is univariately associated with adverse cardiovascular outcomes, this relationship is entirely confounded by age and other clinical covariates.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Within-visit SBP variability may flag higher stroke/CHD risk during visits; leaves open whether it improves risk stratification or warrants intervention trials.
INTRODUCTION: Long-term variability in systolic blood pressure (SBP) is associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular events. Little is known about any association between within-visit SBP variability, stroke, coronary heart disease (CHD), and cardiovascular (CV) death. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Participants included adults ≥ 18 years who participated in the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys from 1999 to 2012 linked to the national death index in 2012. Stroke was self-reported. SBP was obtained up to four times by a physician, using a manual sphygmomanometer according to standard procedures. Within-visit SBP variability was defined as the standard deviation of the BP measurements, stratified into quartiles. We evaluated the relationship between within-visit SBP variability and the odds of stroke or CHD using multivariable logistic regression, and with CV mortality, using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS: Of the 27,987 adults, 16.4% were aged ≥ 65 years, 51.3% were female, 71.2% were white, and 10.7% were black. Factors associated with higher mean SBP variability included older age, hypertension, chronic kidney disease, peripheral artery disease, and smoking (all p < 0.05). The prevalence of stroke significantly increased across SBP variability quartiles, from 2.1% for quartile 1 to 3.7% for quartile 4 (p < 0.001). High SBP variability was associated with higher odds of stroke [odds ratio (OR) 1.8, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.4-2.2], coronary heart disease (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.6-2.4), and increased risk of CV mortality [hazard ratio (HR) 2.7, 95% CI 2.3-3.1]. The relationships were not observed after adjusting for covariables. CONCLUSIONS: Within-visit variability in SBP is associated with increased risks of stroke, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular mortality, but the relationship is confounded by age and covariates.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Anisetti et al. (2023) conducted a cross-sectional in Stroke, coronary heart disease, and cardiovascular mortality (n=27,987). High within-visit systolic blood pressure variability (Quartile 4) vs. Low within-visit systolic blood pressure variability (Quartile 1) was evaluated on Stroke (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.4-2.2, p=<0.001). High within-visit systolic blood pressure variability was associated with increased odds of stroke (OR 1.8), but this relationship was no longer significant after adjusting for age and covariates.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: