Key result
Serial cardiac biomarkers combined with remote hemodynamic monitoring strongly improve chronic HF risk prediction.
Why the study?
Do serial cardiac biomarkers and hemodynamic feedback improve prognostication and risk prediction in patients with chronic heart failure?
Do serial cardiac biomarkers and hemodynamic feedback improve prognostication and risk prediction in patients with chronic heart failure?
Serial measurement of cardiac biomarkers combined with hemodynamic feedback from remote monitoring devices may improve risk stratification and management in chronic heart failure.
INTRODUCTION: Heart failure (HF) is considered as a chronic long-term and lethal disease and will continue to be a major public health problem. Studying (circulating) biomarkers is a promising field of research and could be the first step toward HF tailored prognostic strategies as well as understanding the response to HF drugs in CHF patients. AREAS COVERED: In literature, there has been considerable research on elevated biomarker levels that are related to a poor prognosis for HF. Since biomarker levels change over time, it is important to study serial (repeated) biomarker measurements which may help us better understand the dynamic course of HF illness. However, the majority of research focuses predominantly on baseline values of biomarkers. Additionally, remote monitoring devices, like sensors, can be used to link hemodynamic information to freshen biomarker data in order to further ameliorate the management of HF. EXPERT OPINION: Novel biomarkers and additional scientific insights with hemodynamic feedback strongly aid in the prognostication and risk prediction of chronic HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Allach et al. (2023) conducted a review in Chronic heart failure. Serial cardiac biomarkers and remote monitoring devices was evaluated. Serial cardiac biomarkers combined with hemodynamic feedback from remote monitoring devices strongly aid in the prognostication and risk prediction of chronic heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: