Key result
LBBAP achieves 95% implant success without acute complications in patients with prior valvular interventions.
Why the study?
The safety and feasibility of left bundle branch area pacing in patients undergoing valvular interventions needed evaluation.
Is left bundle branch area pacing safe and feasible in patients with recent surgical or percutaneous valvular interventions?
Observational (n=84)
Yes
Is left bundle branch area pacing safe and feasible in patients with recent surgical or percutaneous valvular interventions?
Left bundle branch area pacing is a highly successful (95%) and safe pacing modality for patients requiring pacing after recent surgical or percutaneous valvular interventions.
Supports LBBAP feasibility post-valvular intervention; leaves open need for randomized confirmation of outcomes.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the safety and feasibility of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in patients with valvular interventions. METHODS: Eighty-four patients were included in this study. All patients underwent recent surgical or percutaneous valvular interventions. LBBAP was attempted in all patients. Implant success rates, peri- and postprocedure electrocardiogram, pacing parameters, and complications were assessed at implant, and during follow-up. RESULTS: LBBAP implantation was successful in 80/84 (95%) patients. Mean age was 74.1 ± 13.8 years and 56% patients were male. Prior valvular replacements included: percutaneous aortic (26), surgical aortic (36), combined surgical aortic plus mitral (6), MVR (10), tricuspid (1), and pulmonic (1). Average LVEF was 52.6 ± 11%. Majority of patients underwent LBBAP due to atrioventricular block (76%) and sinus node disease (13%). Total procedure duration was 74.1 ± 12.5 min and fluoroscopic duration was 9.7 ± 6.8 min. Pacing parameters were stable during follow-up period of 10.0 ± 6.3 months. Pacing QRS duration was significantly narrower than baseline QRS duration (131.5 ± 31.4 ms vs. 114.3 ± 13.7 ms, p < .001, respectively). No acute complications were observed. Mean follow-up was 10.0 ± 6.3 months (median: 8.4 months, min: 1 and max: 24 months). During follow-up, there were three device infections and two patients had loss of LBBA capture within 1 month of implant. CONCLUSIONS: LBBAP is a feasible and safe pacing modality in patients with prior interventions for valvular heart disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gül et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Recent surgical or percutaneous valvular interventions (n=84). Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) was evaluated on Implant success rate. Left bundle branch area pacing was successfully implanted in 95% of patients with prior valvular interventions, demonstrating safety and feasibility with no acute complications.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: