Key result
Admission to teaching hospitals compared with nonteaching hospitals was associated with similar rates of defect-free care for heart failure (88% vs 86%; adjusted OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.73-1.34).
Why the study?
Does admission to teaching hospitals compared to nonteaching hospitals improve adherence to guideline-recommended care in patients with heart failure?
Population
304,111 heart failure patients admitted between 2005 and 2014
Comparison
Care at teaching hospitals (TH) vs Care at nonteaching hospitals (NTH)
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
in-hospital
Authors
Loading...
Similar defect-free care rates; supports comparable guideline adherence across hospital types but leaves open effects on clinical outcomes.
Observational (n=304,111)
Yes
Does admission to teaching hospitals compared to nonteaching hospitals improve adherence to guideline-recommended care in patients with heart failure?
Effect estimate: adjusted OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.73-1.34)
Absolute Event Rate: 88% vs 86%
Adherence to heart failure performance measures and guideline-recommended therapies improved over time and was comparable between teaching and nonteaching hospitals.
Patel et al. (2016) conducted an observational in Heart failure (n=304,111). Admission to teaching hospitals vs. Admission to nonteaching hospitals was evaluated on Defect-free care (100% compliance with performance measures) (adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.73-1.34). Admission to teaching hospitals compared with nonteaching hospitals was associated with similar rates of defect-free care for heart failure (88% vs 86%; adjusted OR 0.99; 95% CI 0.73-1.34).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: