Key result
PCI for restenotic bifurcated lesions achieved 95.3% procedural success, and single DES on the main vessel yielded lower 1-year MACE compared to other strategies (10.8% vs 29.6%; p=0.04).
Why the study?
Does percutaneous coronary intervention provide acceptable angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with in-stent restenosis of bifurcated lesions?
Population
64 consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for restenosis of one bifurcated…
Comparison
Percutaneous coronary intervention for… vs Comparison between single drug-eluting stent on…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
one year
Authors
Loading...
Single DES on main vessel may lower MACE in restenotic bifurcations; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
Observational (n=64)
No
Does percutaneous coronary intervention provide acceptable angiographic and clinical outcomes in patients with in-stent restenosis of bifurcated lesions?
PCI for in-stent restenosis of bifurcated lesions is feasible with high procedural success, and a single DES strategy on the main vessel is associated with better long-term clinical outcomes compared to other approaches.
Coroleu et al. (2012) conducted an observational in In-stent restenosis of bifurcated lesions (n=64). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was evaluated on Angiographic and procedural success (final residual stenosis ≤30% in main vessel with TIMI 3 flow in both MV and side branch, and stenosis ≤50% in SB without in-hospital death, MI, or TVR). PCI for restenotic bifurcated lesions achieved 95.3% procedural success, and single DES on the main vessel yielded lower 1-year MACE compared to other strategies (10.8% vs 29.6%; p=0.04).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: