Key result
Buspirone reduces CO2 chemosensitivity in ~43% more HF patients with central apneas versus placebo.
Why the study?
Increased CO2 chemosensitivity triggers central apnoeas in heart failure with negative prognostic impact, but whether buspirone could decrease chemosensitivity and central apnoeas was unproven.
Does oral buspirone reduce CO2 chemosensitivity and central apnoeas in outpatients with systolic heart failure and moderate-severe central apnoeas?
RCT (n=16)
Double-blind
crossover
Does oral buspirone reduce CO2 chemosensitivity and central apnoeas in outpatients with systolic heart failure and moderate-severe central apnoeas?
Short-term treatment with buspirone reduces CO2 chemosensitivity and improves central apnoeas in patients with systolic heart failure.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May merit larger trials for central apnoeas in systolic HF; extends chemosensitivity modulation to randomized data.
Aims Increased chemosensitivity to carbon dioxide (CO 2 ) is an important trigger of central apnoeas (CA) in heart failure (HF), with negative impact on outcome. We hypothesized that buspirone, a 5HT 1A receptor agonist that inhibits serotonergic chemoreceptor neuron firing in animals, can decrease CO 2 chemosensitivity and CA in HF. Methods and results The BREATH study was a randomized, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, crossover study (EudraCT‐code 2015‐005383‐42). Outpatients with systolic HF (left ventricular ejection fraction <50%) and moderate‐severe CA [nocturnal apnoea‐hypopnoea index (AHI) ≥15 events/h] were randomly assigned to either oral buspirone (15 mg thrice daily) or placebo for 1 week, with a crossover design (1 week of wash‐out). The primary effectiveness endpoint was a decrease in CO 2 chemosensitivity >0.5 L/min/mmHg. The primary safety endpoint was freedom from serious adverse events. Sixteen patients (age 71.3 ± 5.8 years, all males, left ventricular ejection fraction 29.8 ± 7.8%) were enrolled. In the intention‐to‐treat analysis, more patients treated with buspirone (8/16, 50%) had a CO 2 chemosensitivity reduction >0.5 L/min/mmHg from baseline than those treated with placebo (1/16, 6.7%) (difference between groups 43%, 95% confidence interval 14–73%, P = 0.016). Buspirone compared to baseline led to a 41% reduction in CO 2 chemosensitivity ( P = 0.001) and to a reduction in the AHI, central apnoea index and oxygen desaturation index of 42%, 79%, 77% at nighttime and 50%, 78%, 86% at daytime (all P < 0.01); no difference was observed after placebo administration (all P > 0.05). No patient reported buspirone‐related serious adverse events. Conclusions Buspirone reduces CO 2 chemosensitivity and improves CA and oxygen saturation across the 24 h in patients with HF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Giannoni et al. (2020) conducted an RCT in Heart failure with central apnoeas (n=16). buspirone vs. placebo was evaluated on decrease in CO2 chemosensitivity >0.5 L/min/mmHg (difference 43%, 95% CI 14-73, p=0.016). Buspirone reduced CO2 chemosensitivity >0.5 L/min/mmHg in 50% of heart failure patients with central apnoeas compared to 6.7% with placebo.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: