Key result
The Omron MX3 Plus device passed ESH validation, with a mean difference from mercury sphygmomanometers of -1.15 mmHg for systolic and -1.61 mmHg for diastolic pressure.
Why the study?
Does the Omron MX3 Plus oscillometric blood pressure measuring device accurately measure blood pressure compared to reference mercury sphygmomanometers in adults?
Population
33 adults aged 30 years or above, divided into specific blood pressure categories.
Comparison
Omron MX3 Plus oscillometric blood pressure… vs Two reference mercury sphygmomanometers
Design
Cross-sectional
Authors
Loading...
Supports Omron MX3 Plus validation in controlled settings; leaves open generalizability to routine clinical practice.
Cross-Sectional (n=33)
Does the Omron MX3 Plus oscillometric blood pressure measuring device accurately measure blood pressure compared to reference mercury sphygmomanometers in adults?
The Omron MX3 Plus automated blood pressure device is accurate and validated according to the ESH international protocol for adult use.
Coleman et al. (2005) conducted a cross-sectional in Blood pressure measurement (n=33). Omron MX3 Plus (model HEM-742-E) oscillometric blood pressure measuring device vs. Reference mercury sphygmomanometers was evaluated on Validation according to the European Society of Hypertension international protocol. The Omron MX3 Plus device passed ESH validation, with a mean difference from mercury sphygmomanometers of -1.15 mmHg for systolic and -1.61 mmHg for diastolic pressure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: