Key result
Percutaneous left stellate ganglion blockade is linked to 0 median ventricular arrhythmias post-procedure.
Why the study?
The time of onset of anti-arrhythmic effects, the safety of a purely anatomical approach in conscious patients, and the benefit of repeated percutaneous stellate ganglion blocks for drug-refractory electrical storm remain unclear.
Does anatomical-based percutaneous left stellate ganglion block reduce ventricular arrhythmia burden in patients with drug-refractory electrical storm?
Observational (n=11)
No
Does anatomical-based percutaneous left stellate ganglion block reduce ventricular arrhythmia burden in patients with drug-refractory electrical storm?
Anatomical-based percutaneous left stellate ganglion block is a safe and rapidly effective treatment for refractory electrical storm, with repeated blocks providing additional benefits.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support stellate ganglion block for refractory electrical storm; leaves open confirmation in randomized trials.
AIMS: The adoption of percutaneous stellate ganglion blockade for the treatment of drug-refractory electrical storm (ES) has been increasingly reported; however, the time of onset of the anti-arrhythmic effects, the safety of a purely anatomical approach in conscious patients and the additional benefit of repeated procedures remain unclear. METHODS AND RESULTS: This study included consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous left stellate ganglion blockade (PLSGB) in our centre for drug-refractory ES. Lidocaine, bupivacaine, or a combination of both were injected in the vicinity of the left stellate ganglion. Overall, 18 PLSGBs were performed in 11 patients (age 69 ± 13 years; 63.6% men, left ventricular ejection fraction 31.6 ± 16%). Seven patients received only one PLSGB; three underwent two procedures and one required three PLSGB and two continuous infusions to control ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). All PLSGBs were performed with an anatomical approach; lidocaine, alone, or in combination was used in 77.7% of the procedures. The median burden of VAs 1 h after each block was zero compared with five in the hour before (P < 0.001); 83% of the patients were free from VAs; the efficacy at 24 h increased with repeated blocks. The anti-arrhythmic efficacy of PLSGB was not related to anisocoria. No procedure-related complications were reported. CONCLUSION: Anatomical-based PLSGB is a safe and rapidly effective treatment for refractory ES; repeated blocks provide additional benefits. Percutaneous left stellate ganglion blockade should be considered for stabilizing patients to allow further ES management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Savastano et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Drug-refractory electrical storm and structural heart disease (n=11). Anatomical-based percutaneous left stellate ganglion blockade (PLSGB) vs. Pre-procedure baseline was evaluated on Median burden of ventricular arrhythmias 1 hour after the block (p=<0.001). Anatomical-based percutaneous left stellate ganglion blockade reduced the median burden of ventricular arrhythmias from 5 in the hour before to 0 in the hour after the procedure.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: