Key result
Atrial functional TR is linked to ~61% lower 1-year mortality and HF hospitalization after TTVR.
Why the study?
Atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation is recognized as a distinct entity, but its characterization varies and a universal definition is lacking.
Does an echocardiography-based definition of atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation predict prognosis in patients treated conservatively or with transcatheter tricuspid valve repair?
Cohort (n=651)
Does an echocardiography-based definition of atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation predict prognosis in patients treated conservatively or with transcatheter tricuspid valve repair?
Effect estimate: HR 0.39
p-value: p=<0.05
An echocardiography-based definition of atrial functional TR identifies a patient phenotype with better survival and lower rates of mortality and heart failure hospitalization compared to non-atrial TR.
May refine TTVR risk stratification; supports atrial TR phenotyping but leaves optimal management open pending prospective trials.
Background: Atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation (atrial TR) has received growing recognition as a TR entity with a distinct cause owing to its independence from valvular tethering as the predominant mechanism underlying TR. However, characterization of atrial TR varies, and a universal definition is lacking. Methods: In total, 651 patients with significant functional TR were analyzed, including 438 conservatively treated individuals and 213 patients who received transcatheter tricuspid valve repair (TTVR). Based on a clustering approach, we defined atrial TR as tricuspid valve (TV) tenting height ≤10 mm, midventricular right ventricular diameter ≤38 mm, and left ventricular ejection fraction ≥50%. Results: Patients with atrial TR were more often females, had higher right ventricular fractional area change, higher left ventricular ejection fraction, and lower LV end-diastolic diameter, TV tenting area and height, lower right ventricular and tricuspid annular size, enlarged, but lower right atrial area and lower TV effective regurgitant orifice area (all P <0.05). Patients with atrial TR had significantly better long-term survival than non-atrial TR in the conservatively treated TR cohort ( P <0.01, n=438). Atrial TR was independently associated with a lower rate of the combined end point of mortality and heart failure hospitalization at 1-year follow-up in the TTVR cohort (hazard ratio, 0.39; P <0.05, n=213). TR degree was significantly reduced after TTVR in non-atrial and atrial TR ( P <0.01). Functional parameters significantly improved following TTVR independent of TR cause ( P <0.05). Conclusions: An echocardiography-based atrial TR definition is associated with prognostic relevance in patients with functional TR in conservatively treated TR and after TTVR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schlotter et al. (2022) conducted a cohort in Significant functional tricuspid regurgitation (n=651). Atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation vs. Non-atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation was evaluated on Combined end point of mortality and heart failure hospitalization (HR 0.39, p=<0.05). Atrial functional tricuspid regurgitation was independently associated with a lower rate of mortality and heart failure hospitalization at 1 year in the TTVR cohort (HR 0.39; P<0.05).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: