Key result
Remote multiparametric heart failure management successfully resolves ~63% of worsening events without hospitalization.
Why the study?
Outpatient management of worsening heart failure is a priority, but the feasibility and safety of remotely managing worsening heart failure events using a multiparametric platform needed evaluation.
Does remote multiparametric management of worsening heart failure prevent hospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure?
Observational (n=161)
No
Does remote multiparametric management of worsening heart failure prevent hospitalization in patients with chronic heart failure?
Remote multiparametric management of worsening heart failure is feasible, safe, and may effectively reduce the need for HF-related hospitalizations in a real-world setting.
Supports remote multiparametric management as a safe alternative in worsening HF; leaves open whether it prevents hospitalizations in randomized trials.
AIMS: From a patient and health system perspective, managing worsening heart failure (WHF) as an outpatient has become a priority. Remote management allows early detection of WHF, enabling timely intervention with the aim of preventing hospitalization. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of remotely managing WHF events using a multiparametric platform. METHODS AND RESULTS: All patients enrolled in the heart failure remote management programme of the Bordeaux University Hospital Telemedicine Center between 1 January and 31 December 2021 were included in the study. Follow-up data were collected until 1 March 2022. Inclusion criteria were chronic heart failure (HF) with New York Heart Association ≥II symptoms and an elevated B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP > 100 pg/mL or N-terminal-pro-BNP > 1000 pg/mL). Patient assessments were performed remotely and included measurements of body weight, blood pressure, heart rate, symptoms, biochemical parameters, and data from cardiac implantable electronic devices when available. In total, 161 patients (71 ± 11 years old, 79% male) were followed for a mean of 291 ± 66 days with a mean adherence to the remote monitoring system of 80 ± 20%. Over this period, 52 (32.3%) patients had 105 WHF events, of which 66 (63%) were successfully managed remotely, the remaining requiring hospitalization. Freedom from WHF events and hospitalization at 300 days were 66% and 85%, respectively (P < 0.001 for the difference). Increased level of BNP was associated with an increased risk of WHF event [hazard ratio (HR) per unit increase in BNP: 1.001; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1-1.002; P = 0.001] and hospitalization (HR 1.002; 95% CI 1.002-1.003; P = 0.002). A decrease in the level of glomerular filtration rate was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (HR per unit decrease in estimated glomerular filtration rate: 0.946; 95% CI 0.906-0.989; P = 0.014). WHF event recurrence and (re)hospitalization rates at 1-month were similar among patients managed remotely (18% and 12%, respectively) and those requiring hospitalization (21% and 10%, respectively). Iatrogenic complications occurred more often during hospitalization than remote management (26% vs. 3%, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that remote management of WHF events based on a multiparametric approach led by a telemedical centre is feasible and safe. Adopting such a strategy for patients with chronic HF could reduce HF-related hospitalizations with expected benefits for patients, care providers, and health care systems.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ploux et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Chronic heart failure with worsening heart failure events (n=161). Multiparametric remote management platform was evaluated on Successful remote management of worsening heart failure events without hospitalization. A multiparametric remote management platform for worsening heart failure was feasible and safe, successfully managing 63% of events remotely with fewer iatrogenic complications compared to hospitalization (3% vs. 26%).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: