Key result
Invasive haemodynamic remote monitoring using the CardioMEMS device reduces heart failure-related hospitalisations by approximately 30% at 6 months compared to standard care, whereas non-invasive telemonitoring shows inconsistent results.
Why the study?
New strategies are needed to prevent HF-related hospitalisations, but results of telemonitoring to date have been inconsistent, particularly for traditional non-haemodynamic parameters.
Does remote monitoring prevent heart failure-related hospitalisations in chronic heart failure patients?
Does remote monitoring prevent heart failure-related hospitalisations in chronic heart failure patients?
This review highlights that while traditional non-haemodynamic telemonitoring has inconsistent results, invasive haemodynamic remote monitoring shows promise in reducing hospitalisations for specific high-risk chronic heart failure patients.
Remote monitoring may help triage stable vs unstable HF patients to reduce hospitalizations; leaves open its impact on outcomes in routine practice.
Exacerbations of chronic heart failure (HF) with the necessity for hospitalisation impact hospital resources significantly. Despite all of the achievements in medical management and non-pharmacological therapy that improve the outcome in HF, new strategies are needed to prevent HF-related hospitalisations by keeping stable HF patients out of the hospital and focusing resources on unstable HF patients. Remote monitoring of these patients could provide the physicians with an additional tool to intervene adequately and promptly. Results of telemonitoring to date are inconsistent, especially those of telemonitoring with traditional non-haemodynamic parameters. Recently, the CardioMEMS device (Abbott Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA), an implantable haemodynamic remote monitoring sensor, has shown promising results in preventing HF-related hospitalisations in chronic HF patients hospitalised in the previous year and in New York Heart Association functional class III in the United States. This review provides an overview of the available evidence on remote monitoring in chronic HF patients and future perspectives for the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of these strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Veenis et al. (2019) conducted a review in Chronic heart failure. Remote monitoring (invasive and non-invasive) vs. Standard care was evaluated. Invasive haemodynamic remote monitoring using the CardioMEMS device reduces heart failure-related hospitalisations by approximately 30% at 6 months compared to standard care, whereas non-invasive telemonitoring shows inconsistent results.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: