Key result
Telemonitoring and remote monitoring in heart failure are feasible, but routinely assessed parameters have not been shown to impact patient outcomes.
Why the study?
Does telemonitoring and remote monitoring improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does telemonitoring and remote monitoring improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
While telemonitoring in heart failure is feasible, current routinely assessed parameters do not significantly improve patient outcomes, highlighting the need for more sensitive invasive hemodynamic monitoring.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Does not support routine use of standard telemonitoring parameters in HF; leaves open whether novel invasive metrics could improve outcomes.
Clinical management of refractory heart failure remains challenging, with a high rate of rehospitalizations despite advances in medical and device therapy. Care can be provided in person, via telehomecare (by telephone), or telemonitoring, which involves wireless technology for remote follow-up. Telemonitoring wirelessly transmits parameters such as weight, heart rate, or blood pressure for review by health-care professionals. Cardiac implantable devices (defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy) also transmit continually interrogated physiological data, such as heart rate variability or intrathoracic impedance, which may be of value to predict patients at greater risk of hospitalization for heart failure. The use of remote monitoring techniques facilitates a rapid and regular review of such data by health-care workers as part of a heart failure management programme. Current evidence supports the feasibility of such an approach but routinely assessed parameters have been shown not to impact patient outcomes. Devices that directly assess cardiac haemodynamic status through invasive measurement of pressures are currently under investigation and could potentially increase the sensitivity and specificity of predicting heart failure events. The current evidence for telemonitoring and remote monitoring, including implantable haemodynamic devices, will be reviewed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2011) conducted a review in chronic heart failure. Telemonitoring and remote monitoring was evaluated. Telemonitoring and remote monitoring in heart failure are feasible, but routinely assessed parameters have not been shown to impact patient outcomes.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: