Why the study?
Does remote patient monitoring improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Does remote patient monitoring improve outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Remote patient monitoring has the potential to improve heart failure management, but current efficacy data are inconsistent and widespread implementation faces medicolegal and financial hurdles.
Heart failure (HF) poses a significant economic burden on our health-care resources with very high readmission rates. Remote monitoring has a substantial potential to improve the management and outcome of patients with HF. Readmission for decompensated HF is often preceded by a stage of subclinical hemodynamic decompensation, where therapeutic interventions would prevent subsequent clinical decompensation and hospitalization. Various methods of remote patient monitoring include structured telephone support, advanced telemonitoring technologies, remote monitoring of patients with implanted cardiac devices such as pacemakers and defibrillators, and implantable hemodynamic monitors. Current data examining the efficacy of remote monitoring technologies in improving outcomes have shown inconsistent results. Various medicolegal and financial issues need to be addressed before widespread implementation of this exciting technology can take place.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palaniswamy et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: