Key result
Lead I R-wave amplitude identifies LVOT origin in V3-transition arrhythmias with ~93% sensitivity.
Why the study?
Electrophysiology algorithms for localizing left versus right origins of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias with lead V3 transition required further investigation in clinical practice.
Does lead I R-wave amplitude accurately distinguish LVOT from RVOT origin in patients with outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias with lead V3 transition?
Cohort (n=121)
Observers blinded to site of origin
No
Does lead I R-wave amplitude accurately distinguish LVOT from RVOT origin in patients with outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias with lead V3 transition?
Effect estimate: AUC 0.926
Absolute Event Rate: 92.9% vs 88.2%
Lead I R-wave amplitude ≥0.45 mV is a simple and highly accurate ECG criterion for distinguishing LVOT from RVOT origin in outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias with lead V3 transition.
May aid preprocedural localization of outflow tract arrhythmias; extends prior ECG indices but remains hypothesis-generating.
Background The electrophysiology algorithm for localizing left or right origins of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (OT‐VAs) with lead V 3 transition still needs further investigation in clinical practice. Hypothesis Lead I R‐wave amplitude is effective in distinguishing the left or right origin of OT‐VAs with lead V 3 transition. Methods We measured lead I R‐wave amplitude in 82 OT‐VA patients with lead V 3 transition and a positive complex in lead I who underwent successful catheter ablation from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT) and left ventricular outflow tract (LVOT). The optimal R‐wave threshold was identified, compared with the V 2 S/V 3 R index, transitional zone (TZ) index, and V 2 transition ratio, and validated in a prospective cohort study. Results Lead I R‐wave amplitude for LVOT origins was significantly higher than that for RVOT origins (0.55 ± 0.13 vs. 0.32 ± 0.15 mV; p < .001). The area under the curve (AUC) for lead I R‐wave amplitude as assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was 0.926, with a cutoff value of ≥0.45 predicting LVOT origin with 92.9% sensitivity and 88.2% specificity, superior to the V 2 S/V 3 R index, TZ index, and V 2 transition ratio. VAs in the LVOT group mainly originated from the right coronary cusp (RCC) and left and right coronary cusp junction (L‐RCC). In the prospective study, lead I R‐wave amplitude identified the LVOT origin with 92.3% accuracy. Conclusion Lead I R‐wave amplitude provides a useful and simple criterion to identify RCC or L‐RCC origin in OT‐VAs with lead V 3 transition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2020) conducted a cohort in Outflow tract ventricular arrhythmias (n=121). Lead I R-wave amplitude vs. Right ventricular outflow tract origin was evaluated on Diagnostic accuracy (AUC) for predicting left ventricular outflow tract origin (AUC 0.926). Lead I R-wave amplitude ≥0.45 mV predicted left ventricular outflow tract origin of ventricular arrhythmias with lead V3 transition with 92.9% sensitivity, 88.2% specificity, and an AUC of 0.926.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: