Key result
Lower discharge GNRI is linked to ~6% higher mortality per unit drop in ADHF.
Why the study?
Although the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index predicts long-term survival in acute decompensated heart failure, the optimal timing for its evaluation during hospitalization remains unclear.
Does evaluating the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) at hospital discharge predict long-term mortality better than at hospital admission in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Cohort (n=1,474)
Yes
Does evaluating the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) at hospital discharge predict long-term mortality better than at hospital admission in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Evaluating the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) at hospital discharge rather than at admission provides a superior and independent prediction of long-term all-cause mortality in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
Discharge GNRI may improve long-term mortality risk stratification in ADHF; leaves open whether discharge-guided interventions alter outcomes.
Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is known both as a reliable indicator of nutritional status and a predictor of long-term survival among patients with acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). However, the optimal timing to evaluate GNRI during hospitalization remains unclear. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed patients hospitalized with ADHF in the West Tokyo Heart Failure (WET-HF) registry. GNRI was assessed at hospital admission (a-GNRI) and discharge (d-GNRI). Out of 1474 patients included in the present study, 568 (40.1%) and 796 (57.2%) patients had lower GNRI (<92) at hospital admission and discharge, respectively. After the follow-up (median 616 days), 290 patients died. The multivariable analysis showed that all-cause mortality was independently associated with d-GNRI (per 1 unit decrease, adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 1.06, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.04–1.09, p < 0.001), but not with a-GNRI (aHR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.97–1.01, p = 0.341). The predictability of GNRI for long-term survival was more pronounced when evaluated at hospital discharge than at hospital admission (area under the curve 0.699 vs. 0.629, DeLong’s test p < 0.001). Our study suggested that GNRI should be evaluated at hospital discharge, regardless of the assessment at hospital admission, to predict the long-term prognosis for patients hospitalized with ADHF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ono et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (n=1,474). Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) at hospital discharge vs. Higher GNRI (≥92) or GNRI at hospital admission was evaluated on All-cause mortality at maximum follow-up (aHR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.09, p=<0.001). Lower Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index at hospital discharge was independently associated with increased long-term all-cause mortality (aHR 1.06 per 1 unit decrease) in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: