Key result
GDF-15 and hs-TnT predict cardiovascular events in early diabetes, while NT-proBNP predicts later-stage risk.
Why the study?
Based on the complex pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis, dynamic changes in the prognostic value of cardiovascular biomarkers over time were hypothesized.
Does the prognostic value of cardiovascular biomarkers (GDF-15, NT-proBNP, hs-TnT) change in relation to the duration of disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Observational (n=746)
Yes
Does the prognostic value of cardiovascular biomarkers (GDF-15, NT-proBNP, hs-TnT) change in relation to the duration of disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus?
Effect estimate: HR 1.53 (95% CI 1.30-1.80)
p-value: p=<0.01
The prognostic power of cardiovascular biomarkers in type 2 diabetes changes dynamically over time, with GDF-15 and hs-TnT performing better in early disease and NT-proBNP performing better in longstanding disease.
May warrant duration-specific biomarker thresholds in T2DM; leaves open validation in prospective trials.
Background Based on the complex pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes and atherosclerosis we hypothesized a dynamic change in prognostic value of cardiovascular biomarkers over time. Methods In this prospective study 746 patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus, being followed up for 60 months were analysed. The primary endpoint was defined as unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular disease or death. Beside others, especially the prognostic performance of the biomarkers of interest (GDF-15, NT-proBNP, hs-TnT) was evaluated in relation to quartiles of diabetesduration. Results In patients having a diabetes duration below 7 years lnGDF-15 (HR 2.84; p < 0.01) and lnhs-TnT (HR 2.96; p < 0.01) were significant predictors of the primary endpoint. LnAge (HR 40.11; p < 0.01) and lnNT-proBNP (HR 1.61; p < 0.01) were significant predictors in patients with a diabetes duration between 7 and 12 years. In the third quartile (diabetes duration 12–22 years) lnAge (HR 13.09; p = 0.041), urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (HR 2.74; p = 0.001) and lnNT-proBNP (HR 1.81, p < 0.001) predicted the endpoint. In patients with a diabetes duration above 22 years, lnAge (HR 50.79; p = 0.002) and lnNT-proBNP (HR 2.1; p < 0.01) were the only significant predictors of the endpoint. Conclusion Prognostic power of cardiovascular biomarkers changes dynamically in relation to duration of type 2 diabetes mellitus. In patients with shorter duration of the disease markers of subclinical cardiovascular dysfunction and inflammation perform better than markers of systemic advanced organ dysfunction and cardiovascular disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Resl et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Type 2 diabetes mellitus (n=746). Cardiovascular biomarkers (NT-proBNP, GDF-15, hs-TnT) was evaluated on Composite of unplanned hospitalization for cardiovascular causes or all-cause mortality (HR 1.53, 95% CI 1.30-1.80, p=<0.01). Cardiovascular biomarkers exhibit dynamic prognostic power based on diabetes duration, with GDF-15 and hs-TnT predicting events in early disease and NT-proBNP predicting events in later stages.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: