Key result
Historical reflection on heart failure management in 1952 highlights the limited treatments available, such as digitalis and meralluride, and the poor prognosis of patients at the time.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A historical reflection on the evolution of heart failure treatment over the past 70 years.
Seventy years ago, in the spring of 1952, as a medical student at New York University and Bellevue Hospital, I was given the opportunity to assist in the management of patients with heart failure (HF). Treatment was quite limited at the time, consisting of a low salt diet (which was rarely followed), digitalis (now of questionable value), and meralluride (mercuhydrin), a relatively weak organomercurial diuretic which required painful intramuscular injection. Following hospital discharge patients with HF returned to the outpatient clinic for weekly injections of meralluride. Because of chronic nursing shortages, I volunteered to make the injections, which allowed me to establish personal relationships with HF patients, observe their suffering with severe dyspnoea and get a sense of the natural history of this condition. Few patients survived for more than 3 months after hospital discharge, and the patients ‘drowning’ in their pulmonary oedema often caused death. This experience, while sobering,...
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Eugene Braunwald (2022) conducted an editorial in Heart failure. Historical reflection on heart failure management in 1952 highlights the limited treatments available, such as digitalis and meralluride, and the poor prognosis of patients at the time.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: