Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Survey analysis reveals a five-dimension place bonding structure in trout anglers, highlighting distinct cognitive and affective ties to recreation settings.
Place bonding is a common phenomenon in many recreation areas, where people develop an affective and cognitive based attachment to special resource settings. Conceptually, place bonding is fairly well understood; empirically it is less so. In this study, a five dimensional orientation to place bonding of trout anglers for a wild and scenic stream was conceptually and empirically developed. The dimensions of place familiarity, belongingness, identity, dependence, and rootedness were examined by having respondents (n = 203) rate a 26‐item scale of recreation place bonding. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses produced a five‐dimension solution to place bonding. The five‐dimensional model was examined for convergent validity and predictive validity, with the latter predicting 75% of variance in an overall measure of place bonding. Research and management implications are discussed for recreation resource place bonding. Keywords: anglersplace attachmentriver recreationsense of place Notes 1. The two items eliminated from the original model in order to arrive at an acceptable (fit) model were: 'I have many memories of trout fishing on the Chattooga' (familiarity item; = 3.89) and 'The Chattooga is like a home to me' (rootedness item; = 2.98). 2. Portions of these data were adapted from another publication.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hammitt et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: