Key result
Nesiritide improves 24-hour peak expiratory flow rate vs placebo in acute heart failure.
Why the study?
Dyspnea is a key symptom and clinical trial endpoint in AHF, but objective assessment methods are lacking.
Does nesiritide improve peak expiratory flow rate compared to placebo in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
RCT (n=421)
Yes
Does nesiritide improve peak expiratory flow rate compared to placebo in patients with acute decompensated heart failure?
Peak expiratory flow rate provides an objective metric for assessing acute heart failure that correlates with patient-reported dyspnea and demonstrates greater improvement with nesiritide compared to placebo.
Supports nesiritide for dyspnea relief in acute HF; extends subjective benefits to objective PEFR in RCTs.
OBJECTIVES: This study hypothesized that peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) would increase with acute heart failure (AHF) treatment over the first 24 h, related to a Dyspnea Index (DI) change and treatment effect. BACKGROUND: Dyspnea is a key symptom and clinical trial endpoint in AHF, yet objective assessment is lacking. METHODS: In a clinical trial substudy, 421 patients (37 sites) underwent PEFR testing at baseline, 1, 6, and 24 h after randomization to nesiritide or placebo. DI (by Likert scale) was collected at hours 6 and 24. RESULTS: Patients were median age 70 years, and 34% were female; no significant differences between nesiritide or placebo patients existed. Median baseline PEFR was 225 l/min (interquartile range [IQR]: 160 to 300 l/min) and increased to 230 l/min (2.2% increase; IQR: 170 to 315 l/min) by hour 1, 250 l/min (11.1% increase; IQR: 180 to 340 l/min) by hour 6, and 273 l/min (21.3% increase; IQR: 200 to 360 l/min) by 24 h (all p < 0.001). The 24-h PEFR change related to moderate or marked dyspnea improvement by DI (adjusted odds ratio: 1.04 for each 10 l/min improvement [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.07 to 1.10]; p < 0.01). A model incorporating time and treatment over 24 h showed greater PEFR improvement after nesiritide compared with placebo (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: PEFR increases over the first 24 h in AHF and could serve as an AHF endpoint. Nesiritide had a greater effect than placebo on PEFR, and this predicted patients with moderate/marked improvement in dyspnea, thereby providing an objective metric for assessing AHF. (Acute Study of Clinical Effectiveness of Nesiritide in Decompensated Heart Failure [ASCEND-HF]; NCT00475852).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ezekowitz et al. (2012) conducted an RCT in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure (n=421). nesiritide vs. placebo was evaluated on PEFR improvement over 24 h (p=0.048). Nesiritide treatment in acute heart failure resulted in greater peak expiratory flow rate improvement over 24 hours compared with placebo (p=0.048).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: