Intravenous nesiritide reduced pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at 3 hours more effectively than placebo (-5.8 vs -2 mm Hg, P<0.001) and nitroglycerin (-3.8 mm Hg, P=0.03) in decompensated CHF.
RCT (n=489)
Double-blind
Randomized
Yes
Does intravenous nesiritide improve hemodynamics and dyspnea compared to intravenous nitroglycerin or placebo in inpatients with acutely decompensated congestive heart failure?
Intravenous nesiritide provides greater reduction in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure compared to intravenous nitroglycerin or placebo in patients with acutely decompensated heart failure, though symptom improvement differences are modest.
Absolute Event Rate: -5.8% vs -2%
p-value: p=<.001
CONTEXT: Decompensated congestive heart failure (CHF) is the leading hospital discharge diagnosis in patients older than 65 years. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravenous nesiritide, intravenous nitroglycerin, and placebo. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, double-blind trial of 489 inpatients with dyspnea at rest from decompensated CHF, including 246 who received pulmonary artery catheterization, that was conducted at 55 community and academic hospitals between October 1999 and July 2000. INTERVENTIONS: Intravenous nesiritide (n = 204), intravenous nitroglycerin (n = 143), or placebo (n = 142) added to standard medications for 3 hours, followed by nesiritide (n = 278) or nitroglycerin (n = 216) added to standard medication for 24 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) among catheterized patients and patient self-evaluation of dyspnea at 3 hours after initiation of study drug among all patients. Secondary outcomes included comparisons of hemodynamic and clinical effects between nesiritide and nitroglycerin at 24 hours. RESULTS: At 3 hours, the mean (SD) decrease in PCWP from baseline was -5.8 (6.5) mm Hg for nesiritide (vs placebo, P<.001; vs nitroglycerin, P =.03), -3.8 (5.3) mm Hg for nitroglycerin (vs placebo, P =.09), and -2 (4.2) mm Hg for placebo. At 3 hours, nesiritide resulted in improvement in dyspnea compared with placebo (P =.03), but there was no significant difference in dyspnea or global clinical status with nesiritide compared with nitroglycerin. At 24 hours, the reduction in PCWP was greater in the nesiritide group (-8.2 mm Hg) than the nitroglycerin group (-6.3 mm Hg), but patients reported no significant differences in dyspnea and only modest improvement in global clinical status. CONCLUSION: When added to standard care in patients hospitalized with acutely decompensated CHF, nesiritide improves hemodynamic function and some self-reported symptoms more effectively than intravenous nitroglycerin or placebo.
A Wed, study conducted a rct in Decompensated congestive heart failure (n=489). Intravenous nesiritide vs. Intravenous nitroglycerin or placebo was evaluated on Change in pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) and patient self-evaluation of dyspnea at 3 hours (p=<.001). Intravenous nesiritide reduced pulmonary capillary wedge pressure at 3 hours more effectively than placebo (-5.8 vs -2 mm Hg, P<0.001) and nitroglycerin (-3.8 mm Hg, P=0.03) in decompensated CHF.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: