Why the study?
Does nesiritide improve renal function in patients admitted with decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
Does nesiritide improve renal function in patients admitted with decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction?
In patients with decompensated HFpEF, retrospective data suggests nesiritide is safe and may be associated with better preserved renal function at 1 month compared to standard diuretic therapy.
May preserve renal function in decompensated HFpEF; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized confirmation.
The role of nesiritide in patients with decompensated heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (dHFpEF) has not been previously studied. In this investigation, the authors retrospectively analyzed the effect of nesiritide on renal function and clinical outcomes in patients admitted with dHFpEF. Of the 658 patients included, 328 were treated with nesiritide while 330 patients were treated with standard diuretic therapy. In both the nesiritide and no nesiritide groups, there was a significant change in mean glomerular filtration rate (GFR) and creatinine at 72 hours as well as at day of discharge (P<.001). This trend did not progress at 1 month in the nesiritide group, although it did in the no nesiritide group. At 1 month after therapy, however, there was a significant difference between the two groups in the mean change of GFR and creatinine (P<.001). There was no significant difference in >25% decrease of GFR anytime through day 30 (25% vs 29.69%, P=.236) between the two groups. On multivariate analysis, nesiritide was an important predictor of renal function at 1 month (P<.05). Thus, nesiritide can be administered safely without negatively impacting long-term renal function in patients admitted with dHFpEF.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kelesidis et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: