Key result
Improvement of tricuspid valve regurgitation after heart transplantation significantly predicted better long-term survival (HR 0.23) compared to constant or deteriorating regurgitation.
Why the study?
Tricuspid valve regurgitation is frequently observed after orthotopic heart transplantation, but data regarding long-term patient outcomes remain scarce.
Does the trajectory of tricuspid valve regurgitation (improvement vs. deterioration) affect long-term survival and morbidity in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation?
Cohort (n=169)
No
Does the trajectory of tricuspid valve regurgitation (improvement vs. deterioration) affect long-term survival and morbidity in patients after orthotopic heart transplantation?
Deterioration of tricuspid regurgitation after heart transplantation is associated with increased mortality and renal dysfunction, whereas its improvement is a strong predictor of long-term survival.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May inform post-transplant risk stratification via regurgitation trajectory; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective validation.
Background. Tricuspid valve regurgitation (TVR) is often observed after orthotopic heart transplantation. However, there is a scarcity of data regarding long-term outcomes of patients with TVR. Methods. Between January 2008 and December 2015, 169 patients underwent orthotopic heart transplantation at our center and were included in this study. TVR trends and associated clinical parameters were retrospectively analyzed. TVR was assessed after 30 d, 1 y, 3 y, and 5 y, and groups were defined according to changes in TVR grade: constant (group 1; n = 100), improvement (group 2; n = 26), and deterioration (group 3; n = 43). Survival, outcome with regard to operative technique, and long-term kidney and liver function during follow-up were assessed. Results. Mean follow-up time was 7.67 ± 4.17 y (median 8.62, Q1 5.06, Q3 11.16). Overall mortality was 42.0%, with differences between the groups ( P < 0.01). Cox regression analysis revealed improvement of TVR as a significant predictor for survival (hazard ratio 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.63, P < 0.01). After 1 y 2.7%, after 3 y 3.7%, and after 5 y 3.9% of the patients showed persistent severe TVR. Creatinine levels after 30 d and 1, 3, and 5 y showed significant differences between the groups ( P = 0.02, P < 0.01, P < 0.01, and P = 0.01), deterioration of TVR being associated with higher creatinine levels during follow-up. Conclusions. Deterioration of TVR is associated with higher mortality and renal dysfunction. Improvement of TVR may function as a positive predictor for long-term survival after heart transplantation. Improvement of TVR should be a therapeutic goal offering a prognostic value for long-term survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Krey et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Tricuspid valve regurgitation after orthotopic heart transplantation (n=169). Improvement of tricuspid valve regurgitation vs. Constant or deteriorating tricuspid valve regurgitation was evaluated on Long-term survival (HR 0.23, 95% CI 0.08-0.63, p=<0.01). Improvement of tricuspid valve regurgitation after heart transplantation significantly predicted better long-term survival (HR 0.23) compared to constant or deteriorating regurgitation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: