Key result
Novel biomarkers show promise for enhancing heart failure diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized therapy.
Why the study?
BNP is the gold standard in HF management, but novel biomarkers may supplement it to better understand pathophysiology and personalize care across different phenotypes.
Novel biomarkers, particularly those related to inflammation, fibrosis, and noncoding RNAs, hold promise for advancing precision medicine and improving prognostic stratification in heart failure.
Hypothesis-generating for novel HF biomarkers; prospective trials needed before supplementing BNP in practice.
Heart failure (HF) is a complex clinical syndrome with a huge social burden in terms of cost, morbidity, and mortality. Brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) appears to be the gold standard in supporting the daily clinical management of patients with HF. Novel biomarkers may supplement BNP to improve the understanding of this complex disease process and, possibly, to personalize care for the different phenotypes, in order to ameliorate prognosis. In this review, we will examine some of the most promising novel biomarkers in HF. Inflammation plays a pivotal role in the genesis and progression of HF and, therefore, several candidate molecules have been investigated in recent years for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy monitoring. Noncoding RNAs are attractive as biomarkers and their potential clinical applications may be feasible in the era of personalized medicine. Given the complex pathophysiology of HF, it is reasonable to expect that the future of biomarkers lies in the application of precision medicine, through wider testing panels and "omics" technologies, to further improve HF care delivery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Biasucci et al. (2021) conducted a review in Heart failure. Novel biomarkers was evaluated. Novel biomarkers, including inflammatory, fibrotic, neurohumoral, and noncoding RNAs, may supplement traditional markers to improve diagnosis, prognosis, and personalized care in heart failure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: