Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Editorial
This review highlights the evolving role of established natriuretic peptides and emerging biomarkers like sST2, galectin-3, and microRNAs in the personalized management and phenotyping of heart failure.
Heart failure (HF) is the ending of practically all cardiovascular diseases and the reason for hospitalization of 49% of patients in a cardiological hospital. Available instrumental diagnostic methods and biomarkers not always allow verification of HF, particularly in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Prediction of chronic HF in patients with risk factors faces great difficulties. Currently, natriuretic peptides (NUP) are widely used for the diagnosis, prognosis and management of patients with HF and are included in clinical guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of HF. Following multiple studies, the understanding of NUP significance has changed. This resulted in a need for new biomarkers to improve the insight into the process of HF and to personalize the treatment by better individual phenotyping. In addition, current technologies, such as transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic analyses, provide identification of new biomarkers and better understanding of features of the HF pathogenesis. The aim of this study was to discuss recent reports on NUP and novel, most promising biomarkers in respect of their possible use in clinical practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kozhevnikova et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: