Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Research on the social significance of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in journalism, communication, and organizational contexts is often organized around two emphases: one foregrounds disruption, framing standalone Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI) tools as transformative; the other foregrounds invisibility, treating embedded AI as backgrounded. We bridge these emphases with interactional continuity , a user-centered frame that explains cross-modality incorporation at the level of task episodes: AI use stabilizes through sequential placement in ongoing activities, while interface packaging shapes whether it is perceived and named as AI. Grounded in infrastructure theory, platform studies, and digital meaning-making, we examine everyday AI use in the Global South through 28 semi-structured interviews in an Indian workplace. We used iterative AI-assisted and manual coding to identify patterns. Importantly, we found that respondents used AI as episode-level task support within familiar platform routines, illustrating how disruption and invisibility can emerge from task sequencing and interface cues.
Edwards et al. (Tue,) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: