Key result
CCBs show no difference in incident diabetes risk compared to other antihypertensives.
Why the study?
Do calcium channel blockers affect the incidence of diabetes in patients with hypertension compared to other antihypertensive agents?
Meta-Analysis (n=108,118)
Do calcium channel blockers affect the incidence of diabetes in patients with hypertension compared to other antihypertensive agents?
Relative Risk: 0.99 (95% CI 0.85–1.15)
Calcium channel blockers have a neutral effect on incident diabetes compared to other antihypertensive drugs, with ACEIs and ARBs associated with the lowest risk and beta-blockers and diuretics with the highest.
AIMS: Insulin resistance and the progressive loss of β-cell function are components of the fundamental pathophysiology of type II diabetes. A recent experimental study suggested that calcium channel blockers (CCBs) might inhibit β-cell apoptosis, enhance β-cell function, and prevent diabetes. The present meta-analysis examined the clinical effect of CCBs on the incidence of diabetes. METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Science, the Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials. gov were each searched for relevant articles published up to March 11, 2013. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a follow-up period of at least 1-year were included. Identified articles were systematically reviewed, and those with pertinent data were selected for inclusion in a meta-analysis. RESULTS: We included ten RCTs in a meta-analysis. Of the 108,118 people with hypertension and no pre-existing diabetes, 7,073 (6.5%) cases of type II diabetes were reported. CCBs were associated with a higher incidence of diabetes than angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin-receptor blockers (ARBs; pooled risk ratios [95% confidence intervals]: 1.23 [1.01-1.51] and 1.27 [1.14-1.42], respectively) and a lower incidence compared with β blockers or diuretics (0.83 [0.73-0.94] and 0.82 [0.69-0.98], respectively). The overall risk of diabetes among subjects taking CCBs was not significant (0.99 [0.85-1.15]). CONCLUSION: THE USE OF CCBS WAS NOT SIGNIFICANTLY ASSOCIATED WITH INCIDENT DIABETES COMPARED TO OTHER ANTIHYPERTENSIVE AGENTS: the association with diabetes was lowest for ACEIs and ARBs, followed by CCBs, β blockers, and diuretics. Although CCBs can be safely used in hypertensive patients, it would be premature to advocate CCBs for the prevention or treatment of diabetes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noto et al. (2013) conducted a meta-analysis in Hypertension without pre-existing diabetes (n=108,118). Calcium channel blockers vs. Other antihypertensive agents was evaluated on Incidence of diabetes (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.85-1.15). Calcium channel blockers were not significantly associated with incident diabetes compared to other antihypertensive agents overall (RR 0.99).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: