Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim To examine the current prevalence of childhood overweight and obesity in Chengdu (China) and identify multidimensional correlates spanning demographics, family influence, behaviors, and psychological factors. Design Cross-sectional data from the Chengdu Positive Child Development (CPCD) survey, using multistage stratified cluster random sampling and ordered logistic regression to analyze weight status as an ordinal outcome. Methods A total of 4597 children and adolescents aged 8–18 years were included in the final analysis. Analyses were conducted in SPSS 26.0 using chi-square tests, Kruskal-Wallis H tests, and ordered logistic regression. Results The prevalence of overweight and obesity was 9.70% and 6.53% (16.23%), respectively. Compared to children with obese fathers, those with underweight fathers (95% CI: 0.148–0.344), normal weight fathers (95% CI: 0.272–0.506), and overweight fathers (95% CI: 0.414–0.818) had significantly lower odds of elevated weight status (all P < 0.05). Likewise, compared to children whose mothers were obese, those with underweight (95% CI: 0.178–0.495), normal weight (95% CI: 0.354–0.593), and overweight mothers (95% CI: 0.465–0.782) had significantly lower odds (all P < 0.001). Higher weight status was associated with meat-based dietary preference (95% CI: 1.164–2.375), balanced dietary preference (95% CI: 1.150–2.229), and binge eating once or twice a week (95% CI: 1.087–2.076) (all P < 0.05). Longer sleep duration (> 7 h vs. < 5 h: 95% CI: 0.163–0.702; 6–7 h vs. < 5 h: 95% CI: 0.228–0.988) and older age (95% CI: 0.741–0.816) were associated with lower odds, whereas male gender (95% CI: 1.111–1.549) was associated with higher odds of elevated weight status (all P < 0.05). Conclusions Childhood overweight and obesity in Chengdu are familial and lifestyle factors, particularly parental body mass index, dietary preference, and sleep duration. Prevention strategies should target family-based approaches, culturally adapted dietary guidance, and systemic policies to improve sleep by reducing academic pressure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: