This paper considers a troubling form of apartheid ("constrained apartheid") on the basis of race, ethnicity or religion, and demonstrates that the major views claiming that subjection to the state's laws is a prima facie wrong or normative burden or cost ("subjection theories"), cannot easily challenge such an apartheid system.The analysis has several implications, which are briefly explored in the paper.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sahar Akhtar (2024) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: