Key result
Percutaneous transvenous mitral balloon valvuloplasty alone significantly increased mitral valve area from 0.78 to 1.73 cm2 (P<0.0001) and improved symptoms in patients with combined stenosis.
Why the study?
Does percutaneous transvenous mitral balloon valvuloplasty alone improve hemodynamics and symptoms in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis?
Observational (n=12)
Does percutaneous transvenous mitral balloon valvuloplasty alone improve hemodynamics and symptoms in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis?
Absolute Event Rate: 1.73% vs 0.78%
p-value: p=< 0.0001
Mitral valvuloplasty alone is safe and effective in alleviating symptoms in patients with combined mitral stenosis and moderate aortic stenosis, and continuity equation-derived aortic valve areas are flow-independent and useful for decision making.
May support mitral valvuloplasty alone for symptom relief in combined stenosis; hypothesis-generating and requires prospective confirmation.
To investigate the feasibility of percutaneous transvenous balloon dilatation of the mitral valve in patients with combined aortic and mitral stenosis, 12 patients were studied by echocardiography and catheterization before and after mitral valvuloplasty. Aortic stenosis was defined from prevalvuloplasty catheterization study as a transaortic pressure gradient of more than 25 mm Hg. All 12 patients underwent transvenous balloon mitral valvuloplasty successfully. Immediately after the procedure, all patients experienced improvement in clinical symptoms and in hemodynamic variables. Mitral valve areas were significantly increased from 0.78 +/- 0.18 to 1.73 +/- 0.21 cm2 (P < 0.0001) by planimetry method. Cardiac output was significantly increased from 3.6 +/- 0.1 to 4.2 +/- 0.5 L/min (P = 0.01). Mean transaortic flow rate increased 33% (from 198 +/- 68 to 254 +/- 41 mL/s, P = 0.002). Mean pressure gradient across the aortic valve after mitral valvuloplasty was not significantly increased, from 34 +/- 7 to 37 +/- 13 mm Hg. Aortic valve areas, derived from the Gorlin formula, were significantly increased from 0.57 +/- 0.12 to 0.73 +/- 0.14 cm2 (P = 0.006) after mitral valvuloplasty. However, continuity equation-derived aortic valve area was independent of increasing flow rate after mitral valvuloplasty from 1.29 +/- 0.35 to 1.30 +/- 0.29 cm2. During follow-up with a mean of twenty four +/- fourteen months, 8 patients were in New York Heart association functional class I, 3 in class II, and 1 in class IV who received pericardiotomy owing to constrictive pericarditis without aortic valve replacement. In conclusion, mitral valvuloplasty alone may be safe and effective in alleviating symptoms in mitral stenosis patients with transaortic pressure gradient > 25 mm Hg. Continuity equation-derived aortic valve areas seem to be flow independent in evaluation of aortic stenosis and are important for decision making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lee et al. (1997) conducted an observational in Combined aortic and mitral stenosis (n=12). Percutaneous transvenous mitral balloon valvuloplasty vs. Pre-valvuloplasty baseline was evaluated on Mitral valve area by planimetry method (cm2) (p=< 0.0001). Percutaneous transvenous mitral balloon valvuloplasty alone significantly increased mitral valve area from 0.78 to 1.73 cm2 (P<0.0001) and improved symptoms in patients with combined stenosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: