Key result
Prophylactic ICD implantation shows no effect on quality of life or mood in dialysis patients.
Why the study?
The impact of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation on the psychological well-being of patients on dialysis was unknown.
Does primary ICD implantation affect quality of life, depression, and optimism in patients on chronic dialysis?
RCT (n=171)
1:1
Yes
Does primary ICD implantation affect quality of life, depression, and optimism in patients on chronic dialysis?
Prophylactic ICD implantation does not significantly impact quality of life, mood, or dispositional optimism in patients on chronic dialysis over a 1-year follow-up.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Alleviates quality-of-life concerns for prophylactic ICD decisions in dialysis patients; extends randomized evidence on mood and optimism outcomes.
RATIONALE: The impact of prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation on the psychological well-being of patients on dialysis is unknown. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to identify the effect of primary ICD implantation on quality of life (QoL), mood and dispositional optimism in patients undergoing dialysis. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a prespecified subanalysis of the randomized controlled ICD2 trial. In total, 177 patients on chronic dialysis, with an age of 55-81 years, and a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≥ 35%, were included in the per-protocol analysis. Eighty patients received an ICD for primary prevention, and 91 patients received standard care. The Short Form-36 (SF-36), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15), Revised Life Orientation Test (LOT-R) questionnaires were administered prior to ICD implantation (T0), and at 1-year follow-up (T1) to assess QoL, depression and optimism, respectively. The patients were predominantly male (76.0%), with a median age of 67 years. Hemodialysis was the predominant mode of dialysis (70.2%). The GDS-15 score difference (T1 - T0) was 0.5 (2.1) in the ICD group compared with 0.3 (2.2) in the control group (mean difference - 0.3; 95% CI - 1.1 to 0.6; P = 0.58). The LOT-R score difference was - 0.2 (4.1) in the ICD group compared with - 1.5 (4.0) in the control group (mean difference - 1.1 (0.8); 95% CI - 2.6 to 0.4; P = 0.17). The mean difference scores of all subscales of the SF-36 were not significantly different between randomization groups. CONCLUSIONS: In our population of patients on dialysis, ICD implantation did not affect QoL, mood or dispositional optimism significantly during 1-year follow-up. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Unique identifier: ISRCTN20479861. http://www.controlled-trials.com .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Timal et al. (2021) conducted an RCT in End-stage renal disease on chronic dialysis (n=171). Prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation vs. Standard care was evaluated on Change in Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) score from baseline to 1 year (Mean difference -0.3, 95% CI -1.1 to 0.6, p=0.58). Prophylactic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator implantation did not significantly affect quality of life, mood, or dispositional optimism during 1-year follow-up in patients on dialysis.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: